The high price of luxury fashion: €157 million fines for RPM
17 October 2025
17 October 2025
On 14 October 2025, the European Commission fined Gucci, Chloé and Loewe a total of EUR 157 million for breaching competition law by fixing the resale prices charged by independent retailers.
According to the European Commission's press release, Gucci, Chloé and Loewe independently restricted the ability of third-party retailers to set their own online and offline sales prices for branded products, affecting their ranges of clothing, shoes, accessories and leather goods. In particular, the brands required retailers to implement:
Gucci also banned retailers from selling certain products online, constituting an online sales restriction. The aim of these practices was for retailers to match the prices and sales conditions of the brands' own direct sales channels. These practices deprived the retailers of their ability to set their prices independently, and reduced competition between them. The brands also sought to protect their own direct sales channels from competition from the retailers.
The practices began in April 2015 (Gucci), December 2015 (Loewe) and December 2019 (Chloé) and lasted until the European Commission's dawn raids in April 2023. The infringements were found to be EEA-wide. Gucci received the largest fine of EUR 119.6 million. Chloé and Loewe were fined EUR 19.7 million and EUR 18 million respectively. These fines reflect discounts for cooperation with the investigation under the European Commission's antitrust cooperation procedure (including by acknowledging the findings of fact and infringement): Gucci and Loewe each received 50% discounts for their prompt, early stage cooperation, while Chloé was slower to react, receiving a discount of 15%.
The full text versions of the European Commission's infringement decisions are yet to be published.
The European Commission and national regulators have tended to take a sector-by-sector approach to addressing RPM:
For further guidance on RPM and vertical agreements, please refer to our Quickguides:
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.