Australia's Evolving Data Centre Landscape: Policy meets Pipeline
The central challenge for government remains striking the right balance between appropriately rigorous assessment and approvals, unlocking a significant pipeline of investment, making the most of existing enabling infrastructure where possible, developing the skilled workforce required to deliver these projects, incentivising industry to continue innovating, maintaining momentum and capturing value across an ambitious and growing project pipeline.
Announced in March, the Commonwealth Government's Expectations of data centres and AI infrastructure developers is a set of five national expectations to shape the future of data centre and AI infrastructure development in Australia.
Forming a key pillar of the Government's broader National AI Plan, the expectations are a statement of the Government's position on what it considers responsible development in the sector. Satisfying the expectations has been characterised as the foundation of a data centre operator's social licence to operate in Australia. While they are not a statutory requirement, proposals that do not align with the expectations risk being deprioritised in Commonwealth regulatory assessments.
Of note for data centre developers and operators, the $1 billion National Reconstruction Fund provides targeted debt and equity support across a number of categories, including critical technologies and AI related infrastructure. In addition, the R&D Tax Incentive is also available for companies that invest in experimental activities seeking to generate innovative solutions to technical challenges, such as developing new efficient cooling systems or advanced energy-management software.
Announced in March, the NSW Government’s NSW Data Centre Consultation Paper is a proposed principles-based framework for consultation on the management of the opportunities and challenges for data centre development in the state. The draft principles released for consultation are:
The principles are largely aligned with the Commonwealth's expectations and provide more detail about what will guide NSW Government requirements, decision-making processes and, ultimately, the projects identified for accelerated approval. The paper adds to various other NSW policy settings, including the recently established Investment Delivery Authority (IDA).
IDA has endorsed $51.9 billion worth of projects so far, including with 15 data centre projects that will receive specialist Government support from a dedicated concierge service, a planning assessments team and from a multi-agency Investment Taskforce based in the Premier’s Department. The NSW Trade and Investment Strategy highlights artificial intelligence and machine learning as a key strength of NSW and notes there is a strong pipeline of data centre investment in the State, while the recently exhibited draft Sydney Plan highlights the importance of productive industrial lands to underpin essential services including data centres.
In Victoria, the AI Mission Statement sets out the state's ambition to lead in artificial intelligence adoption. This is underpinned by the Sustainable Data Centre Action Plan, which provides an internal framework for better cross-government coordination and planning for data centre development across five key areas:
Additionally, reflecting Victoria's coordinated approach to its data centre enablement activities, Victoria's 10-year Plan for Industrial Land importantly aligns land supply with digital infrastructure demand. An Industrial Land Gateway Service is also helping unlock and accelerate the rezoning and development of industrial lands including for data centres, while a dedicated Development Facilitation Program has been established to streamline planning approvals and therefore reduce project delivery timelines for significant economic developments (which includes data centres with estimated development costs of at least $20 million in metropolitan Melbourne).
Invest Victoria and the Investment Coordinator-General, appointed in early 2025, have also prioritised data centres and AI, offering streamlined facilitation to support investor entry and establishment.
Across other Australian jurisdictions, governments are sharpening settings to attract large-scale data centre investment. The South Australian Government amended planning regulations late last year to allow data centres to be approved through the essential infrastructure pathway and Western Australia has made significant investment in subsea cable infrastructure. The Queensland Government has been working to attract major technology and data centre investments through bodies such as Trade and Investment Queensland and the Department of State Development, Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning, but has not published a specific policy statement.
The national landscape is rapidly evolving. We anticipate that as government understands more about the pipeline, we will see some reprioritisation or reorientation of enabling infrastructure to service projects. This is already evident in Victoria's 10 Year Plan for Industrial Land which explicitly notes that data centres are the foundation of the economy and serviced industrial land is essential to support sector growth, and the Sustainable Data Centre Action Plan which includes using government data to find the best locations for data centres.
The national expectations framework and State policies, while not mandatory, signal that data centres are critical infrastructure, an investment attractor, and Australian governments are motivated to create the right conditions to capture the economic opportunity that data centres present.
In the last year, reflecting the pace of the market, data centres have gone from being almost absent from government infrastructure plans, to featuring heavily in all recent policy announcements. These are important documents that guide the priorities of the public sector and are an important signal to the market that government is listening and invested. Related infrastructure and land use plans for water, energy and industrial lands continue to be reoriented accordingly.
The conversion rate from site acquisition to operational capacity is a critical metric for the data centre sector. Australia offers some of the most favourable market conditions for data centres globally, yet lengthy planning approval timeframes in comparison to global standards remain a key barrier to unlocking investment potential.
Helpfully, State and Federal policies are not seeking to add new process, rather expedite existing assessments and approvals, and introduce far greater coordination between government agencies. This is a challenging task, noting that data centres operate at the nexus of the planning, energy and water systems that are each complex, regulated and dealing not only with data centre demand but that of the wider community. Building social licence becomes even more essential, when using fast-track planning approval pathways.
While speed to market is an industry imperative and expedited assessment and approval frameworks will be helpful in this regard, this should not be at the expense of careful project planning and sequencing, noting the complex delivery landscape and lifecycle risks of converting land into operational data centres.
The removal of roadblocks and setting of expectations is reflective of government using the levers it has to support the data centre industry. With these developments, emphasis shifts back to private proponents with the capacity to innovate and collaborate, with government and other partners, to bring their data centre projects to life.
Proposals likely to proceed through the current policy landscape are those that invest in a sustainable footprint, support Australia's energy transition and contribute to ongoing jobs and broader economic growth.
This could include partnering with renewable energy providers to develop self-sustaining data centre and clean energy precincts, collaborating with water authorities to develop new recycled water infrastructure, offering training programs through educational institutions that support a pipeline of ongoing local employment, providing access for local entrepreneurs as a way to help Australia's AI sector flourish, and innovating in the core technologies underpinning data centre operations to drive efficiency and sustainability outcomes.
Proposals that embrace innovation can also address supply chain risks playing out on the global stage. Innovation is not a cost but an opportunity for industry players to lead the global market from Australia, and is now firmly backed by national data centre policy.
Australia as a whole presents an attractive investment destination, with opportunities available across the region rather than being confined to any single state or territory. The breadth of the market means that investors can consider various jurisdictions, each understanding the opportunities and benefits that data centre investment bring, and offering distinct advantages depending on the nature and scale of the proposed development.
Maximising the chances of success across these jurisdictions is contingent on several considerations, including:
Speak with our Ashurst team about how best to plan, structure, develop and deliver your new or existing proposals. We have extensive experience in navigating government process and requirements efficiently, helping you secure your next data centre investment in Australia.
The fundamentals underpinning Australia's attractiveness as a destination for data centre investment remain firmly intact: a stable operating environment, robust legal protections, abundant renewable energy potential, available land, strategically located deep-sea connectivity and strategic proximity to the rapidly growing Indo-Pacific economies.
As the Commonwealth works with states and territories to implement its expectations through planning, energy and infrastructure approval frameworks, we anticipate further detail on requirements, compliance mechanisms and practical acceleration pathways will emerge and governments will become increasingly coordinated around the opportunities.
Developers and investors with projects in the pipeline should consider engaging with the NSW consultation process during the six-week feedback window open until 8 May 2026 via Infrastructure NSW's webpage and reviewing their proposals against both the Commonwealth's expectations and the NSW principles.
We will continue to monitor developments and are available to advise on all aspects of data centre land acquisition, strategic engagement, project development, energy, water, regulatory approvals, investment structuring, and delivery.
Other authors: Lakshmi Logathassan, Executive; Kurt Cheng, Specialist and Gary Lou, Lawyer.
This publication is a joint publication from Ashurst LLP and Ashurst Risk Advisory LLP, which are part of the Ashurst Group.
The Ashurst Group comprises Ashurst LLP, Ashurst Australia and their respective affiliates (including independent local partnerships, companies or other entities) which are authorised to use the name "Ashurst" or describe themselves as being affiliated with Ashurst. Some members of the Ashurst Group are limited liability entities.
Ashurst LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under number OC330252. It is a law firm authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority of England and Wales under number 468653.
Ashurst Risk Advisory LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under number OC442883 and is part of the Ashurst Group. Ashurst Risk Advisory LLP services do not constitute legal services or legal advice, and are not provided by qualified legal practitioners acting in that capacity. Ashurst Risk Advisory LLP is not regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority of England and Wales. The laws and regulations which govern the provision of legal services in other jurisdictions do not apply to the provision of risk advisory services.
For more information about the Ashurst Group, which Ashurst Group entity operates in a particular country and the services offered, please visit www.ashurst.com.
This material is current as at 7 April 2026 but does not take into account any developments to the law after that date. It is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and in practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to, and does not constitute legal advice. The information provided is general in nature, and does not take into account and is not intended to apply to any specific issues or circumstances. Readers should take independent legal advice. No part of this publication may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from Ashurst. While we use reasonable skill and care in the preparation of this material, we accept no liability for use of and reliance upon it by any person.