UK: Panel Executive publishes two new Practice Statements
On 8 October 2015, the Takeover Panel published Practice Statement No. 29 (Rule 21.2 - Offer-related arrangements) and Practice Statement No. 30 (Rule 20.2 - Information required for the purpose of obtaining regulatory consents).
Practice Statement No. 29 (Rule 21.2 - Offer-related arrangements)
This Practice Statement provides guidance on the general prohibition on offer-related arrangements set out in Rule 21.2 of the Code, including that:
- The exception allowing a target to give a commitment to provide information/assistance for the purposes of obtaining any official authorisation or regulatory clearance includes information required by a bidder in the preparation of an equity prospectus, circular or similar document. It does not, however, include information/assistance required by a bidder in connection with (i) an application to a tax authority seeking specific tax treatment; or (ii) the preparation of a bond prospectus in relation to the refinancing of bank facilities. Whilst a target can choose to provide such information voluntarily, it cannot be required to provide such information or assistance.
- (an obvious point but…) While a bidder, other than on a reverse takeover, may give a commitment not to invoke a condition to its offer, the target must not agree that a condition may be invoked by a bidder or agree not to object to a bidder seeking to invoke a condition.
- A trigger in a reverse break fee that relates to the target having taken or not taken certain action should not breach Rule 21.2 provided that there is no obligation on the target to take or not take that action - note, however, that conditions which might have the effect of deterring potential competing bidders from making an offer would fall on the wrong side of the line e.g. that the target does not engage in discussions with competing bidders or does not provide information to competing bidders beyond the information which is required to be supplied under Rule 20.2 (equality of information to competing offerors).
- In cases of doubt about the application of Rule 21.2, the Panel must be consulted.
Above all, when advising on a transaction involving a Code company, always consider incorporating the following clause into an agreement that may contain "offer-related arrangements" (e.g. a confidentiality agreement, merger agreement or framework agreement) in case the transaction morphs from a non-Code transaction into a Code transaction:
"The parties agree that, if the Takeover Panel determines that any provision of this agreement that requires the [Code company] to take or not to take action, whether as a direct obligation or as a condition to any other person's obligation (however expressed), is not permitted by Rule 21.2 of the Takeover Code, that provision shall have no effect and shall be disregarded."
Section 4 of Practice Statement No.29 incorporates the relevant contents of Practice Statement No 27 (Rule 21.2 - Directors' irrevocable commitments and letters of intent) and Section 8 of Practice Statement No 29 incorporates the relevant contents of Practice Statement No.23 (Rule 21.2 - Inducement fees and other offer-related arrangements), which have both accordingly been withdrawn.
Practice Statement No.30 (Rule 20.2 - Information required for the purpose of obtaining regulatory consents)
This Practice Statement provides guidance on the Panel's practice where the target provides commercially sensitive information (restricted information) to "outside counsel" of the bidder (the "clean team") for the purposes of enabling the bidder to establish whether regulatory clearances are necessary. The Panel usually applies Rule 20.2 in such a way that where a bona fide potential competing bidder requests access to the restricted information, the target is only required to provide that information to equivalent "outside counsel" of the potential competing bidder. The target must consult the Panel and obtain its consent to apply Rule 20.2 in this manner.
The Practice Statement also sets out various safeguards required by the Panel to prevent the restricted information being passed to the bidder from the clean team including:
- restrictions on the number and identity of members of the clean team receiving the restricted information;
- arrangements to protect the confidentiality of the restricted information, including effective information barriers;
- confirmations from the bid parties regarding: (i) the identity of the members of the clean team; (ii) the waiver by the bidder of any rights to access the restricted information from a member of the clean team; and (iii) no access to the restricted information by the bidder; and
- confirmations from each firm represented on the clean team that: (i) it will not disclose the information to the bidder or any person outside the clean team other than relevant regulatory authorities; (ii) it has effective information barriers in place; and (iii) it will notify the Panel if restricted information moves outside the clean team.
If any restricted information is provided to, accessed by, or deduced by the bidder or any advisers outside the clean team, the Panel must be informed promptly. In these circumstances, Rule 20.2 would normally be applied in the usual way and such restricted information would need to be provided, on request, directly to a competing bidder.
Key Contacts
We bring together lawyers of the highest calibre with the technical knowledge, industry experience and regional know-how to provide the incisive advice our clients need.
Keep up to date
Sign up to receive the latest legal developments, insights and news from Ashurst. By signing up, you agree to receive commercial messages from us. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Sign upThe information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.