Doubling down: the Australian Government doubles penalties for serious competition and consumer law breaches
On 26 March 2026, the Commonwealth Government passed legislation doubling the maximum penalties for contraventions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA) and the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). Here is what you need to know:
Businesses operating in Australia should be doubling down on their competition and consumer law compliance efforts, as the consequences of breach are now even more significant.
The Commonwealth Government has expressed concerns that companies may exploit the rising fuel prices due to the Middle Eastern conflict by engaging in anticompetitive conduct or breaching consumer law to inflate their profits. The Government considered that the existing maximum penalties under the CCA were insufficient to deter companies from engaging in anti-competitive and anti-consumer behaviour, pointing to research by the OECD that found Australia's penalties were low by international standards. It has only been three and a half years since the Australian Government last increased the maximum penalties (see our previous article from October 2022 here).
The fixed monetary limb of the maximum penalty for corporations increased from $50 million to $100 million per contravention for breaches of competition and consumer law protections under the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Act 2026 (Act), passed on 26 March 2026.
The doubling applies to the most significant competition and consumer law prohibitions, including:
Maximum penalty for a body corporate for breaches going forward will be the greatest of:
The second and third limbs of the maximum penalties provisions were not amended. Similarly, the maximum penalties applicable to individuals have not changed. The Act also does not amend the maximum penalties in the Australian Securities and Investment Commission Act 2001 (Cth) (ASIC Act), despite the ASIC Act replicating various ACL prohibitions. It is possible that this discrepancy will be resolved in the future by similarly increasing the penalties for the relevant prohibitions in the ASIC Act.
Practically, the doubling of maximum penalties means that we are likely to see Courts imposing even higher penalties for anticompetitive conduct and breaches of consumer law, although this will take time to fully materialise given the lead time involved in investigating breaches and enforcement proceedings.
To determine the appropriate penalty in any given case, Australian Courts apply a well-established framework that takes into account a range of factors beyond the maximum penalty amount, including the nature, extent, and duration of the contravening conduct, the size and financial position of the contravener, the amount of any benefit derived, the degree of cooperation with the ACCC, the deterrent effect of the penalty on the contravener and on others, and whether the contravener has previously been found to have engaged in similar conduct.
The trend in recent years has been towards substantially higher penalties, with the ACCC seeking and Courts increasingly willing to impose penalties at the higher end of the spectrum. Examples of some of the highest penalties imposed in recent competition and consumer law matters include:
With the increase in maximum penalties, this trend towards higher penalties is likely to accelerate.
The Government has emphasised that the increased maximum penalties are intended to apply in the most egregious instances of non-compliance. The ACCC has welcomed the amendments and publicly announced that they "will seek the highest penalties appropriate in any cases we bring to the courts".
1. Heightened enforcement risk
The doubling of penalties signals a clear escalation in the Government's expectations that the ACCC pursue large penalties for anti-competitive conduct and consumer law breaches. Businesses should expect the ACCC to seek — and courts to award —higher penalties than those we have seem to date.
2. Focus on the fuel sector and cost-of-living pressures
The context to the penalty reforms makes it likely that the fuel sector will attract particular scrutiny from the ACCC, following its announcement of its investigation into petrol and diesel prices set by major fuel suppliers in the wake of the Middle Eastern conflict. The fuel sector is also facing Government scrutiny, with a taskforce established to ensure sufficiency of supply across the country.
More broadly, any sector in which consumers are experiencing cost-of-living pressures — including groceries, energy, and essential services — is likely to face heightened regulatory attention. We expect the ACCC to pursue conduct that inflates prices or misleads consumers during periods of economic stress with renewed vigour.
Other authors: Venthan Brabaakaran, Expertise Lawyer and Sophie Doyle, Lawyer.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.