UK and EU reimpose Iranian sanctions following UN snapback
02 October 2025
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), agreed in 2015 between Iran and the E3/EU+3 (China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the European Union), was designed to ensure the exclusively peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear programme, in exchange for extensive sanctions relief. Under the JCPOA, Iran committed to strict limitations on its nuclear activities, and in return, the United Nations, EU, and US lifted a broad range of economic and financial sanctions, enabling renewed international trade and investment with Iran.
However, the diplomatic landscape shifted in 2018 when the US unilaterally withdrew from the JCPOA and reimposed those of its sanctions that it had lifted. In the years that followed, Iran incrementally ceased performing its JCPOA commitments, including exceeding uranium enrichment limits and restricting International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) access.
Despite ongoing diplomatic efforts, by August 2025, the E3 (UK, France, and Germany) concluded that Iran’s non-compliance could not be resolved through negotiation. On 28 August 2025, the E3 formally notified the UN Security Council of Iran’s significant non-performance, thereby triggering the “snapback” mechanism under the JCPOA. This mechanism provided for the automatic reimposition of UN sanctions that had been lifted under the agreement, unless the Security Council decided otherwise within 30 days - a decision that did not materialise.
As a result, from 28 September 2025, the UN sanctions on Iran that had been lifted under the JCPOA were formally reinstated.
The snapback reinstates a suite of measures previously imposed by a series of UN Security Council resolutions between 2006 and 2015 (Resolutions 1696, 1737, 1747, 1803, 1835, and 1929). The reimposed UN sanctions include:
UN member states are required to implement the reimposed measures in their domestic law. The practical impact of snapback will depend on whether, and to what extent, individual UN member states do this.
Following the reimposition of UN sanctions, the EU moved swiftly to reinstate a broad range of autonomous restrictive measures that had previously been suspended under the JCPOA.
On 29 September 2025, the Council of the EU adopted new regulations to reintroduce these measures, which go beyond the requirements of the UN Security Council snapback. This was effected by amendments to various EU legal instruments, including by amending the EU's existing primary Iran nuclear sanctions instrument (Regulation (EU) No 267/2012) by Council Regulation (EU) 2025/1975, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1980 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1982.
Key elements of the EU's sanctions include:
The EU’s measures are designed to exert additional pressure on Iran and are more extensive than the UN sanctions, although they do not fully revert to the pre-2015 sanctions regime.
In response to the snapback, the UK amended its Iran (Sanctions) (Nuclear) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 by The Iran (Sanctions) (Nuclear) (EU Exit) (Amendment) Regulations 2025, to reflect the snapback of UN sanctions.
In addition, on 29 September 2025, the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office added 71 new individuals and entities to the UK Sanctions List. These individuals and entities are now subject to an asset freeze. They include significant actors in Iran's economy including the National Iranian Oil Company, National Iranian Gas Company and several prominent banks. The UK has issued certain "winddown General Licences" to "manage unintended consequences for UK businesses".
The UK has also said that it "intends to bring in legislation to impose further sectoral measures. In line with our partners, this will target finance, energy, shipping, software, and other significant industries which are advancing Iranian nuclear escalation". We anticipate that the UK will move to align its sanctions legislation with the measures adopted by the EU.
The practical effect of the reimposed measures depends on the extent to which businesses are dealing with the targeted Iranian sectors, or designated individuals or entities. Many businesses who have previously disengaged from Iran, or have no involvement with sectors or designated targets, will not be affected.
Despite this, businesses with any exposure to Iran, or Iranian persons, must exercise vigilance and conduct thorough due diligence.
Key points for compliance include:
Failure to comply with sanctions can result in criminal penalties. If there is any uncertainty regarding the application of the new measures, do not hesitate to reach out to any of our key contacts below.
Other author: Rebecca Akroyd, Junior Associate
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.