Rolling forward: The rise of continuation vehicles in private equity
20 August 2025
20 August 2025
Continuation vehicles are investment structures that involve a private equity fund manager facilitating the sale of one or more portfolio companies from existing fund vehicle(s) (existing fund) to a new vehicle managed by the fund manager (continuation vehicle). The continuation vehicle will typically involve new investors (as well as, potentially, some investors from the existing fund).
While continuation vehicles are well-established in Europe and the United States, the use of continuation vehicles in Australia is just starting to gain traction. We are likely to see a greater uptake in Australia as a bona fide exit option, mirroring the experience in overseas markets, particularly with the IPO window continuing to be subdued. As the prevalence of continuation vehicles in the Australian market increases, it is important for private equity fund managers and investors to consider the key structural, valuation and governance considerations for such investment structures, which we cover in this article.
Continuation vehicles were originally viewed as a potential solution for 'problem' assets held by closed-end private equity funds. If an asset held by a fund vehicle was not suitable for sale as the fund was reaching the end of its term, or market conditions were sub-optimal, a continuation vehicle provided additional turn-around time or allowed assets to be sold when market conditions improved. More recently, continuation vehicles are actually being used by fund manager's for their best performing assets, to provide existing investors with an exit and the manager more time to grow and develop (and provide new investors with exposure to) high performing assets.
In Australia, this may be a partial response to the subdued IPO window in Australia since 2021.
The use of continuation vehicles presents several strategic benefits for stakeholders, such as:
Continuation vehicles generally differ from primary investment vehicles in a number of respects, such as:
A key focus for both investors in the existing fund and the investors in the continuation vehicle are the valuation of the assets and sale terms. Industry practice is for the sale price of the assets to be supported by:
Interests are better aligned when the private equity fund manager and, potentially, the founders, roll over a substantial stake at the same price as the existing and new investors.
Market practice is not yet settled for continuation vehicle transactions. However, unlike traditional M&A transactions, warranties in continuation vehicle transactions tend to be limited to information and title warranties. Extensive business warranties are less common, except where warranty & indemnity insurance can be utilised.
Given that in continuation vehicle transactions the same private equity manager is on both sides of the transaction, there are inherent conflicts of interest that need to managed. Best practices for mitigating conflicts of interest include:
Continuation vehicles are expected to play an increasingly significant role for private equity managers in Australia, particularly as the market matures and managers are seeking opportunities for managing longer-term capital.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.