Quickguides

Enforcement of an English judgment overseas

Enforcement of an English judgment overseas

    You have won your litigation in the English courts and secured a judgment against the losing party. But what if the losing party fails to comply? Your English court judgment is of little commercial value unless you are able to enforce it. 

    This guide explains the procedures for enforcing an English judgment in various jurisdictions, including Scotland and overseas.

    In respect of EU and EFTA states, this guide explains the enforcement procedures that apply to English court judgments in proceedings commenced after 31 December 2020. It does not cover enforcement under the Recast Brussels Regulation1 or Lugano Convention2.

    Enforcement is not automatic

    A court will not automatically enforce your judgment. As the judgment creditor, you must take steps to recover what you are entitled to. This becomes more complicated when the losing party (the judgment debtor) or their assets are located outside England and Wales.

    The enforcement process

    Before you can enforce your English judgment overseas, it must be recognised by the country where you intend to enforce it (the enforcement state). The English courts have reciprocal recognition and enforcement regimes with numerous countries. The applicable arrangement depends on several factors, including: 

    • The country where you intend to enforce the judgment.
    • The date the proceedings started.
    • Whether the dispute is subject to a contractual jurisdiction clause, the nature of such a clause and the date it was entered into.
    • The nature of the dispute.

    Once you have ascertained which regime applies, you must apply to the overseas court to register your judgment in accordance with the requirements of the applicable enforcement regime. Once the judgment is registered, it will have the same effect (for the purposes of enforcement) as if it had been made by the overseas court. You will then be able to take advantage of the methods of enforcement available in the enforcement state. 

    If no regime applies, the local law of the enforcement state will govern the enforcement of the judgment. This may involve using the judgment to bring a debt claim in the enforcement court, with procedures varying depending on the enforcement state.

    Which regime?

    For an English judgment to be directly enforceable overseas, there needs to be a reciprocal regime in place. Regimes exist between England and Wales and: 

    • Former and current British Overseas Territories, Commonwealth and some other countries,3 under the Administration of Justice Act 1920 (the 1920 Act).
    • Former and current British Overseas Territories, Commonwealth and some other countries,4 under the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1933 (the 1933 Act).
    • Other parts of the United Kingdom under the amended Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 (the 1982 Act).
    • EU member states, Albania, Mexico, Moldova, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Singapore, Switzerland and Ukraine under The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements 2005 (the Hague Convention 2005).
    • EU member states (excluding Denmark), Ukraine and Uruguay under The 2019 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (the Hague Judgments Convention 2019).

    At Appendix 1 there is a flow diagram which provides guidance on which regime applies. At Appendix 2 there is a table comparing the key provisions of the different regimes. A quick summary is provided below.

    The 1920 Act 

    Scope

    The regime applies to the enforcement of final and conclusive money judgments made by a court in civil proceedings.

    Procedure

    Apply to register your judgment with the courts of the enforcement state within 12 months of the date of the judgment. The application must be accompanied by a certified copy of the judgment, a translation of the judgment, and a witness statement. 

    Reasons for refusal

    The overseas court may refuse to register the judgment if it considers it unjust or inconvenient, or if specific grounds such as inadequate service of proceedings, fraud or public policy apply.

    The 1933 Act

    Scope

    The regime applies to the enforcement of final and conclusive money judgments made by a court in civil proceedings. It does not apply to injunctions but does cover interim payment orders.

    Procedure

    Apply to register your judgment with the overseas court within six years of the date of the judgment. Provide the court with a certified copy of the judgment, a translation of the judgment, and a witness statement. 

    Reasons for refusal

    The overseas court may refuse to register the judgment if it has been wholly satisfied, could not be enforced in England and Wales, or if specific grounds such as lack of jurisdiction, fraud, or public policy apply.

    Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982

    Scope

    The 1982 Act provides for the recognition and registration of any money or non-money judgment or order awarded in another part of the United Kingdom, excluding provisional orders such as freezing orders and interim injunctions. 

    Procedure

    Obtain a certificate from the English court confirming the details of the judgment (or in the case of non-money judgments, a certified copy of the judgment) and register the judgment with the foreign court within six months of receipt of the certificate or certified copy.

    Reasons for refusal

    The English court will not provide a certificate or certified copy of the judgment if: 

    • there is an ongoing appeal or the time limits for appealing have not expired; or
    • enforcement of the judgment has been stayed or the time for enforcement of the judgment has expired.

    The judgment debtor may apply to set aside the registration of the judgment if the judgment was registered contrary to the provisions of the 1982 Act or if the dispute had previously been the subject of a judgment of another court having jurisdiction in the matter.

    The Hague Convention 2005

    Scope

    The Convention applies to judgments that flow from an exclusive jurisdiction clause entered into on or after the date when the Convention came into force in the country specified in the exclusive jurisdiction clause.5 An exclusive jurisdiction clause for these purposes is a clause that prescribes one jurisdiction in which the parties must litigate.

    A 'judgment', includes money and non-money judgments, default judgments and costs determinations, but not interim protective measures or procedural rulings. 

    The Hague Convention 2005 covers judgments in civil and commercial matters but does not apply to matters involving: family law; wills and succession; insolvency; arbitration; consumer protection; employment; insurance; some intellectual property matters; certain land rights; and company law. 

    Procedure

    Follow the specific procedure governed by the law of the enforcement state, and provide the overseas court with:

    • A complete and certified copy of the judgment.
    • The exclusive choice of court agreement.
    • In the case of a default judgment, a document proving that the defaulting party was notified of the document which instituted the proceedings.
    • Documents that establish that the judgment has effect or is enforceable in the state of origin.
    • Any other documents the enforcing court may require in order to verify that the conditions for enforcement have been met.
    • Certified translations of these documents if they are not in an official language of the enforcement state.

    Reasons for refusal

    The overseas court may refuse recognition or enforcement if the judgment is not enforceable in England or if one or more of the specific grounds listed in the Convention apply, such as nullity of the underlying agreement, lack of capacity, fraud or public policy.

    The Hague Judgments Convention 2019

    Scope

    The Convention entered into force in the England and Wales on 1 July 2025 and will only apply to court proceedings issued on or after that date. In order for an English judgment to be enforced overseas, the Convention must have also come into force in the enforcement state. The Convention is intended to be complementary to, and will not supersede, the Hague Convention 2005.

    The Convention applies to money and non-money judgments (excluding interim measures) in civil and commercial matters, subject to exceptions. Notable exceptions include: family law matters; wills and succession; insolvency; defamation; privacy; intellectual property; certain competition matters; and arbitration.

    An English judgment will only be enforceable in a signatory state if one of the bases for recognition and enforcement listed in Article 5 of the Convention applies. An important basis for recognition is that the judgment flows from a choice of court agreement in favour of the English courts, other than an exclusive jurisdiction clause. As a result, judgments made pursuant to non-exclusive and asymmetric jurisdiction clauses will fall within the Convention.

    Procedure

    Follow the procedural rules of the enforcement state and provide the overseas court with documents similar to those required by the Hague Convention 2005. 

    Reasons for refusal

    The Convention provides a list of grounds upon which the enforcement court may refuse to recognise or enforce a judgment, including inadequate notice, fraud, public policy and inconsistency with other judgments. 

    Conclusion

    Enforcing an English judgment overseas can be complex and requires understanding of the applicable enforcement regime and local laws. Always seek legal advice to navigate the process effectively. For further information, please contact your usual Ashurst contact or a member of our dispute resolution team.

    Appendix 1

    Enforcement regime flow-diagram

      Appendix 2

      Enforcement regime comparison table

      Regime (in date order)Member statesEffective fromScopeReasons for refusalLimitation PeriodImpact of Appeals
      Administration of Justice Act 1920 Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados Belize, Bermuda, Botswana, British Indian Ocean Territory, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Christmas Island, Cocos (Keeling) Islands, Republic of Cyprus, Dominica, Falkland Islands, Fiji, The Gambia, Ghana, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, Kenya, Kiribati, Lesotho, Malawi, Malaysia, Malta, Mauritius, Montserrat, New Zealand, Nigeria, Territory of Norfolk Island, Papua New Guinea, St. Christopher and Nevis, St. Helena, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Solomon Islands, Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia in Cyprus, Sri Lanka, Swaziland, Tanzania, Trinidad and Tobago, Turks and Caicos Islands, Tuvalu, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.

      The date the reciprocal regime of the enforcement state came into force is a matter of local law and guidance should be sought from local counsel.

      The 1920 Act came into force in England and Wales on 23 December 1920 and has been subject to subsequent variations.

      The regime applies to final and conclusive money judgments only.

      Enforcement under the 1920 Act is discretionary; the court must consider it just and convenient to enforce the judgment in the country of enforcement.

      The original court acted without jurisdiction.

      The judgment debtor did not carry out business and was not ordinarily resident in the jurisdiction of the original court and did not voluntarily appear or otherwise submit to the jurisdiction of the court.

      The judgment debtor was not duly served with the process of the original court and did not appear.

      Fraud in obtaining the judgment.

      Appeal is pending, or the judgment debtor is entitled to and intends to appeal against the judgment.

      Contrary to public policy.

      An application for registration of the judgment must be made within 12 months of the date of the judgment or such longer period as allowed by the court.A pending appeal is a ground for refusal of enforcement.
      Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1933

       Australia, Canada (except Quebec), India, Israel, Norway, Pakistan, Guernsey, Jersey and the Isle of Man.

      Also applies to judgments from Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands where the subject matter of the judgment is outside the scope of the European regime (i.e. the Lugano Convention and the Recast Brussels Regulation).

      The date the reciprocal regime of the enforcement state came into force is a matter of local law and guidance should be sought from local counsel.

      The 1933 Act came into force on 13 April 1933 and has been subject to subsequent variations.

      The regime applies to final and conclusive money judgments only.

      The judgment has been wholly satisfied.

      The judgment could not be enforced by execution in the country of the original court.

      The original court acted without jurisdiction.

      The judgment debtor did not receive notice of the proceedings in sufficient time to defend, and as a result did not appear.

      Fraud in obtaining the judgment.

      Appeal is pending, or the judgment debtor is entitled to and intends to appeal against the judgment.

      Contrary to public policy.

      The dispute in question was the subject of a previous final and conclusive judgment by a court having jurisdiction.

      An application for registration of the judgment must be made within six years of the date of the judgment.If the court thinks fit, it may set aside the registration of a judgment if an appeal is pending or the judgment debtor intends to appeal.
      Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982All parts of the United Kingdom.The relevant parts of the Act came into force on 1 January 1987 and have been subject to subsequent variations.Money and non-money judgments, excluding provisional orders e.g. freezing orders and interim injunctions

      There is an ongoing appeal or the time for bringing an appeal has not elapsed.

      Enforcement of the judgment has been stayed or the time available for enforcement has expired.

      The matter arising in the dispute before the original court had previously been the subject of a judgment of another court having jurisdiction in the matter.

      An application to register the judgment must be made in the enforcement state within six months of the English courts producing the relevant certificate or certified copy judgment.The English courts will not produce the documents required to register the judgment in the enforcement state until (i) the time for bringing an appeal has expired and no such appeal has been brought, or (ii) if an appeal was brought, it has been finally disposed of.
      The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements 2005UK, EU member states, Albania, Mexico, Moldova, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Singapore, Switzerland and Ukraine.1 October 2015

      The dispute must fall within an exclusive jurisdiction clause in favour of the English courts.

      The Convention does not apply to consumer or employment contracts or matters relating to insolvency, competition, personal injury, land or certain intellectual property rights.

      The agreement was null and void under the law of the original court.

      Lack of capacity to conclude the agreement under the law of the enforcement state.

      Lack of, or inadequate, notice of the original proceedings.

      Fraud.

      Public policy.

      Inconsistency with another judgment between the same parties, or with an earlier judgment in another state.

      An appeal is pending or the time limit for appealing has not expired.

      There is no specific limitation period but the judgment should be registered without delay.Recognition or enforcement may be postponed or refused if the judgment is the subject of appeal or if the time limit for appealing has not expired.
      Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters 2019UK, EU member states (except Denmark), Ukraine and Uruguay1 July 2025

      Judgments in civil or commercial matters excluding revenue, customs or administrative matters i.e. insolvency, defamation, privacy and intellectual property rights.

      At least one of the following must apply:

      (i) a jurisdiction clause in favour of the English courts (excluding an exclusive jurisdiction clause).

      (ii) judgment debtor has habitual residence, principal place of business or branch/agency/ establishment in the enforcement state.

      (iii) the judgment debtor expressly consented to the English court's jurisdiction.

      (iv) contractual obligation to be performed in England or Wales.

      (v) tort committed in England or Wales.

      (vi) land in the England or Wales or an English or Welsh trust.

      The judgment debtor was provided with inadequate notice of the original proceedings.

      Fraud in obtaining the judgment.

      Contrary to public policy.

      The original proceedings were contrary to an agreement to determine the dispute in another state.

      Judgment inconsistent with (i) a judgment given by a court of the requested state in a dispute between the same parties; or (ii) an earlier judgment given by a court of another state (for instance, a third state) between the same parties on the same subject matter, provided that the earlier judgment fulfils the conditions necessary for its recognition in the requested state.

      Recognition/enforcement may be postponed if proceedings between the same parties on the same subject matter are pending before a court of the enforcement state and that court was seized first.

      An appeal is pending or the time limit for appealing has not expired.

      N/ARecognition or enforcement may be postponed or refused if the judgment is subject to appeal or if the time limit for appealing the judgment has not expired.

      1. Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast).
      2. The 2007 Lugano Convention on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters.
      3. As at 20 June 2025 these countries were: Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bermuda, Botswana, British Indian Ocean Territory, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Christmas Island, Cocos (Keeling) Islands, Republic of Cyprus, Dominica, Falkland Islands, Fiji, The Gambia, Ghana, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, Kenya, Kiribati, Lesotho, Malawi, Malaysia, Malta, Mauritius, Montserrat, New Zealand, Nigeria, Territory of Norfolk Island, Papua New Guinea, St. Christopher and Nevis, St. Helena, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Solomon Islands, Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia in Cyprus, Sri Lanka, Swaziland, Tanzania, Trinidad and Tobago, Turks and Caicos Islands, Tuvalu, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.
      4. As at 20 June 2025 these countries were: Australia, Canada (except Quebec), India, Israel, Norway, Pakistan, Guernsey, Jersey and the Isle of Man. The 1933 Act continues to apply to judgments from recognised courts in Norway as a result of a treaty between the UK and Norway signed on 13 October 2020, which took effect when the 2007 Lugano Convention ceased to apply to the UK on 31 December 2020 and only applies to judgments in proceedings instituted after that date. The 1933 Act also applies to judgments from Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands where the subject matter of the judgment is outside the scope of the European regime.
      5. Note that as a matter of English law, the Convention applies to exclusive English choice of court agreements entered into from the date of ratification by the EU (including the UK, but not Denmark) i.e. 1 October 2015. Note, however, that the EU Commission has said that it considers that the Convention only applies to exclusive English choice of court agreement entered into after 11p.m. on 31 December 2020, the date of the UK's independent accession. The Commission's view is not binding on courts in EU member states, but they may well follow the Commission's approach, and not enforce English judgments under the Hague Convention 2005 where the exclusive jurisdiction agreement designating the English courts was concluded before that date. Ultimately, the point may be referred to the CJEU. The relevant date for EU member state and Mexican exclusive jurisdiction clauses is 1 October 2015, for Singapore it is 1 October 2016, for Montenegro 1 August 2018, for Denmark 1 September 2018, for Albania 1 October 2024, for Moldova 1 July 2024, for Ukraine 1 August 2023, for Switzerland 1 January 2025 and for North Macedonia 1 March 2025.

      The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
      Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.