What you need to know
- On 28 November 2025 Treasury published for consultation its draft law package and position paper to implement the Scam Prevention Framework (SPF), with the consultation period to close 5 January 2026.
- The consultation package includes:
- A draft instrument to designate banks, telecommunications providers and certain digital platforms under the SPF from 1 July 2026;
- A draft instrument to authorise the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) to be the SPF's external dispute resolution (EDR) scheme from 1 September 2026 (AFCA will be required to accept SPF complaints for EDR from 1 January 2027); and
- A position paper that outlines early thinking on the sector codes and rules.
- Subject to any changes that result from the consultation process, the consultation package clarifies a number of key questions regarding how the SPF will take effect:
- Designation scope – The designation instrument provides technical details of the businesses and services included and excluded for designation;
- Timing – The SPF will take effect on 1 July 2026 where we expect the sector codes and rules will be finalised ahead of that date, and the SPF will be fully implemented for the 3 initially designated sectors by the end of 2027;
- Scope of Actionable Scam Intelligence – Actionable Scam Intelligence (ASI), defined as forming a reasonable belief activity is or may be a scam, will be continuously generated from prevent, detect, report and respond pillar activities. Newly generated ASI triggers obligations to detect, disrupt and report based on the ASI.
- Timeliness of SPF obligations – A number of SPF obligations are time-bound, reflecting that time is of the essence when acting on ASI. For example, if a bank is aware that a customer has been scammed, a bank must 'immediately' issue a recall request to the receiving bank and the receiving bank must 'immediately' act upon a payment recall request made by another bank.
- Disruptive actions and notifications – A number of SPF obligations require businesses to stop transactions, suspend accounts and ban parties from designated services. Businesses must notify customers impacted by disruption activities which will attract tensions with AUSTRAC tipping off rules.
- Statement of compliance – Businesses must provide customers with a statement regarding their compliance with their SPF obligations within 30 days of receiving an internal dispute resolution (IDR) scam compliant in order to reduce information asymmetry between businesses and customers.
- The consultation package also leaves certain key details unaddressed for the time being:
- Reporting of Actionable Scam Intelligence – Rules related to some obligations under SPF Principle 4 Report and SPF Principle 5 Disrupt dealing with ASI will be made by 31 March 2027 with industry obligations to commence by the end of 2027; and
- Compensation rules – The position paper contains little discussion on compensation rules. The position paper leaves to presumption that a regulated entity may be required to compensate customers for scam losses if the entity has not met its obligations under the SPF, and that failure can be seen to have contributed to the customer scam loss. The position paper states that where multiple regulated entities are involved in a single scam, regulated entities are expected to work together cooperatively through IDR to compensate customers, but does not outline how this may work in practice.
What you need to do
- Review the consultation package and identify any elements that (i) require additional guidance to implement and (ii) are at risk of leading to unintended consequences;
- Confirm that governance arrangements for SPF oversight are in place and that they meet relevant requirements;
- Review the scope of your operations to understand what activities provide designated services to SPF consumers;
- Confirm that you are on track to meet relevant industry code requirements by 1 July 2026, including operating at the speed that time-bound obligations require;
- Implement a robust and scalable approach for managing a continuous flow of ASI and taking the required detect, disrupt and report actions accordingly;
- Develop an approach to support providing IDR customers with a statement of compliance regarding complaints related to scams; and
- Review your compensation rules for alignment with SPF obligations.
Our take
The consultation package brings the SPF timeline into view and elaborates specific and principles-based obligations that will take effect from 1 July 2026.
A summarised version of industry code obligations presented in the position paper are as follows (with obligations in bold where we envision implementation complexity):
| Pillar | Banks | Digital platforms | Telecos |
| Governance | - Embed responsibility for scam prevention within governance frameworks including strategic risk management and oversight
|
| Prevent | - Have systems in place to identify vulnerabilities that could be exploited by scammers
- Require multi-factor authentication (MFA) for new devices
- Provide accessible information to customers regarding scam risks
- Protect brand from being used in scams (including social media and search)
- Provide scam prevention training to staff
|
Banks - Targeted warnings for high-risk payments
- Confirmation of Payee
- Systems to verify identity of customers and nature of their transactions
| Digital platforms - Verify advertisers hold licenses to provide high-risk products
- Warnings to customers of high-risk circumstances
- Authentication processes to ensure accounts are legitimate (and not previously banned)
- Business users and advertisers provide appropriate identification
| Telecos - Verify customer has valid use case before providing certain services (such as originating calls using another number)
|
| Detect | - Businesses must investigate ASI
- Maintain systems capable of identifying customers potentially impacted by a scam
|
Banks - Monitor all transactions for suspicious activity and identify ASI
- Identify customers who have made a payment to a known scam account
| Digital platforms - Proactively delete accounts, content, messages and advertisements suspected of being a scam
- Identify, notify and warn owners of an account that may be compromised
- Identify, notify and warn customers who have communicated with a scam account or interacted with scam advertisements
| Telecos - Analyse calls and messages for patterns or indicators of a scam
- Identify customers who have received scam calls or messages, with a focus on those who have interacted with the communication
|
| Disrupt | - Alert customers where there is a risk they are involved in an ongoing scam
- Issue targeted scam alerts to customers where there is a reasonable suspicion that a specific scam threat may impact them
- Restore disrupted services when an investigation clears the service of being involved in a scam
- Notify customers impacted by disruption activities
|
Banks - Close and block payments to and from accounts controlled by scammers (or freeze account and return it to the owner)
- Act urgently to make and receive payment recall requests
- Suspend accounts under investigation
- Enable customers to freeze accounts
| Digital platforms - Permanently ban users and advertisers found to have been operating scams and prevent them from creating new accounts
- Permanently remove or delist scam content
- Limit visibility of content of advertisers under investigation
- Flag content and messages under investigation
- Suspend visibility of advertising under investigation
| Telecos - Block calls and messages to and from calling line identifiers (CLI) confirmed to be a scam
|
| Report | - Consultation to occur via a subsequent process
|
| Respond | - Publish information about how to urgently report a scam that may be in progress
- Accept scam reports 24/7
- Provide acknowledgement of receipt of scam report within no more than 24 hours
|
It is evident that the intent behind the industry codes is to harness the power of ASI to disconnect scammers from designated services, making it difficult for scammers to reach customers and perpetrate scams.
Each designated sector will face a unique set of implementation challenges. These will call for businesses to balance the objective of protecting consumers from scams with the desire to provide services to legitimate customers in a seamless and efficient manner.