Major Overhaul of Indonesia’s Carbon Regulatory Framework
23 December 2025
After a few years of trial and error since the launch in 2021 of its carbon pricing framework, the Government of Indonesia enacted Presidential Regulation No. 110 of 2025 on the Implementation of Carbon Economic Value Instruments and National Greenhouse Gas Emissions Control (“PR 110/2025”). This regulation revokes and replaces Presidential Regulation No. 98 of 2021 (“PR 98/2021”), which for four years had formed the bedrock of Indonesia’s carbon pricing and greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions control regime. Please refer to our previous article here for an overview of the previous framework under PR 98/2021.
The new regulation arrives at a time when global attention on the credibility and effectiveness of carbon markets is at a peak following COP 30 which focused on further operationalizing carbon markets under the Paris Agreement (Article 6), emphasizing the need for high-integrity credits, and linking domestic and international markets, with new coalitions forming (such as the Carbon Market Coalition). Countries have been converging around internationally aligned carbon governance systems, in part to ensure the integrity of domestic emissions reduction claims and in part to secure access to rapidly expanding international demand for high-quality carbon units. Indonesia, with its vast natural carbon sinks, rising domestic emissions profile, and growing pipeline of renewable and decarbonisation projects, has every incentive to position itself as a jurisdiction capable of generating both compliance-grade and voluntary-market carbon units, and of doing so in a way that can withstand international scrutiny.
As many commentators and market participants have observed over the past 4 years, despite initial attempts at developing a comprehensive carbon regulatory framework, the implementation of a carbon market in Indonesia has been slow to materialise and, regulatory uncertainty around international carbon trading has affected transactions and investments in a sector in which Indonesia offers significant potential. It was therefore timely to do a re-set of the regulatory and investment framework to offer better clarity and investor confidence and allow for enhanced integration with international carbon markets.
This is what Indonesia aims to achieve with the issuance of PR 11/2025 which is a substantial instrument spanning 103 articles across 9 main chapters each addressing a distinct aspect of the national climate and carbon governance framework. The new regulation delivers a more structured and internationally compatible framework, providing greater legal certainty and aligning Indonesia’s climate policy instruments with its enhanced Nationally Determined Contribution ("NDC") commitments. PR 110/2025 marks a shift from fragmented coordination prevailing under the previous regime towards a more centralized governance model and introduces the concept of "carbon allocation" as the foundation for emissions planning. The regulation also expands eligibility for carbon trading, clarifies institutional oversight and governance, and transitions registry functions to the new national platform for the issuance and tracking of carbon units (SRUK).
This article provides an overview of the main changes and structural improvements introduced by PR 110/2025, and presents key takeaways for stakeholders looking to invest or participate in Indonesia's carbon market.
| Chapter 1 | General Provisions |
| Sets purpose, scope, definitions, and core pillars of the regulatory framework. | |
| Chapter 2 | Planning, Preparation, and Determination of NDC |
| Establishes carbon allocation (and reserves) to guide baselines, targets, and action plans for Indonesia's NDC. | |
| Chapter 3 | Implementation of Carbon Economic Value Instruments |
| Regulates carbon economic value instruments (trading, performance-based payments, levy), emissions trading quotas and carbon tax. | |
| Chapter 4 | Transparency Framework |
| Mandates integrated MRV, separates SRN PPI from SRUK. | |
| Chapter 5 | Monitoring and Evaluation |
| Requires periodic, multi level monitoring and evaluation with consolidated annual reporting. | |
| Chapter 6 | Guidance and Funding |
| Provides government guidance and capacity‑building and identifies funding sources. | |
| Chapter 7 | Steering Committee |
| Creates a cross‑ministerial committee (including the financial regulator) to direct, coordinate, supervise, and evaluate the implementation of the carbon market & instruments. | |
| Chapter 8 | Transitional Provisions |
| Provides a one‑year alignment period for existing plans, untraded units, and prior international carbon economic value agreements. | |
| Chapter 9 | Closing Provisions |
| Repeals PR 98/2021, preserves non‑conflicting implementing rules until replaced. |
PR 110/2025 acts as an umbrella regulation setting out the key pillars and principles of Indonesia's new carbon framework but is to be complemented by a number of implementing regulations including:
As foreshadowed in the introduction, the new framework promulgated through PR 110/2025 aims at addressing the following factors:
PR 110/2025 establishes a more detailed and structured framework for the implementation of carbon economic value instruments and GHG emissions control.1 Under PR 98/2021, these functions were recognized, but spread across multiple institutional tracks that were not always adequately synchronized in implementation. This resulted in legal ambiguity regarding the holder of authority over certification, registry, and, critically also, on the possibility and technicalities of cross-border trading.
Where PR 98/2021 was conceptual and broad, often leaving gaps that sectoral ministries were meant to fill with their own implementing regulations, PR 110/2025 appears to be far more integrated. There is a noticeable shift from a “policy declaration” style of regulation to a more operationalised and market-friendly framework. As an evidence of this shift, the new regulation introduces terms that investors will recognise from other functional carbon markets, such as carbon units, emissions quotas, unit registries, and corresponding adjustments.
One of the most meaningful changes is the introduction of the concept and mechanism of carbon allocation. Under PR 98/2021, sectoral emissions limits existed conceptually, but they were not embedded in a unified national process and lacked a clear allocation mechanism across sectors.
PR 110/2025 mandates that newly introduced carbon allocations serve as the basis for NDC planning and target setting. The carbon allocation mechanism establishes the permissible amount of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions for specific periods, determined in accordance with national capacity.2 The allocation process is based on (i) regularly updated sectoral GHG inventory data, (ii) economic considerations, (iii) climate change mitigation efforts, as well as (iv) the availability of national carbon reserves in order to make Indonesia’s NDC targets more achievable.
Ministries are required to incorporate allocations directly into NDC planning, with each sector having to implement emissions budgets that are traceable to national targets.3 The allocation framework is applied at both sectoral and installation levels, directly connecting national emissions ceilings to regulated entities and aims to provide a measurable basis for NDC implementation.4
Additionally, the new regime includes further focus on processes to achieve NDC implementation. The regulation mandates the preparation of detailed roadmaps, including baselines, targets, scenarios, governance structures, funding needs, and technology requirements.5 These roadmaps are intended to serve as an operational planning tool, linking national climate commitments to sectoral action plans, implementation timelines, and institutional responsibilities. This includes provisions to ensure coordination of target setting and action planning at the national, sectoral, provincial, and (where relevant) district/city levels, with clearer timelines and responsibilities.6
PR 110/2025 introduces more detailed rules for the certification and use of carbon units:
These documents must include details on project design, compliance with relevant standards, and the specifics of emissions reduction or absorption.
Importantly also, international trades that do not require corresponding adjustments and do not require government authorization are now legally recognized under PR 110/2025. This removes a significant gap that existed under the previous regime which hindered voluntary carbon projects by creating ambiguity over whether units generated in Indonesia could be exported or purchased and traded by international buyers. Critically also, international carbon trading can commence without waiting for Indonesia’s NDC targets to be achieved (to the contrary of the requirements which applied under the previous regime of PR 98/2021). This marks a strategic shift that allows Indonesian developers and projects to reach international markets immediately and supports the commercial viability of projects across a range of mitigation sectors, including forestry, blue carbon, renewable energy, methane reduction, waste management, and other sectors.
Additionally, PR 110/2025 broadens the definition of recognised carbon units to include units issued under international certification schemes, alongside domestically issued SPE-GRK. Projects certified under international carbon trading schemes (such Verra, Gold Standard, and other global voluntary carbon standards) must be registered via the DPP route, obtain sectoral approval, and have their carbon units recorded in the national registry, whereas for international transfers under the Article 6 framework, authorization from the Ministry of Environment (with recommendation from the relevant ministers) and a corresponding adjustment are additionally required.11 However, unlike the situation which prevailed under PR 98/2021, PR 110/2025 does not expressly require mutual recognition arrangements with international standards bodies, leaving certain procedural and institutional questions to be addressed through future implementing regulations.
Under PR 98/2021, the National Registry System for Climate Change Mitigation (Sistem Registri Nasional Pengendalian Perubahan Iklim or “SRN PPI”) attempted to serve as both an NDC-tracking system and a carbon-unit registry. In practice, this created confusion and made it difficult to integrate Indonesia’s units with international systems.
PR 110/2025 now introduces a new Carbon Unit Registry System (Sistem Registri Unit Karbon or "SRUK"), which is aimed to be a dedicated registry specifically for carbon units. SRUK must provide transparent, real-time, traceable, and permanent records of issuance, transfer, and retirement, and it must be interoperable with international registries. All carbon trading and emission offset must now be recorded in the SRUK.12 This is one of the most welcome improvements from a market perspective because it directly addresses concerns about double counting, inconsistent unit histories, and lack of visibility over carbon-unit provenance. The establishment of SRUK further centralizes and streamlines the registration and tracking of carbon units, enhancing institutional oversight and market integrity.13 It remains to be seen how the registry will be implemented in practice and whether a brand new website and online system is developed and launched, or whether the existing SRN-PPI online platform is to be repurposed to include the SRUK registry.
One of the structural weaknesses of PR 98/2021 was the lack of a clear mechanism for issuing tradable emissions units to regulated facilities. The concept of “Upper Emission Limits” did not translate effectively into a tradable market instrument.
PR 110/2025 introduces GHG Emission Quotas which are allocated through the carbon allocation framework (see point 2 above) and function as compliance-grade tradable units. This represents an important step towards a full cap-and-trade system. Installations covered under the emissions-trading regime will receive quotas, monitor their emissions, and trade surplus or deficit quotas in the market. It is also intended for installations that exceed their allocated quotas to eventually be subject to a carbon-tax.
PR 110/2025 does not impose an immediate financial or criminal penalty for exceeding GHG emission quotas. This is a stark difference from PR 98/2021 which previously provided administrative sanctions for businesses that did not register their climate change mitigation actions on the SRN PPI. However, as mentioned above, the carbon tax should eventually be implemented in practice, and administrative sanctions may be further specified in some of the upcoming implementing regulations.
PR 110/2025 also further refines and expands the suite of "carbon economic value instruments" which was initially introduced by PR 98/2021, including:
| Carbon Trading: | Now explicitly includes both emissions trading (cap-and-trade) and offset mechanisms, with detailed procedures for allocation, trading, and compliance.14 |
| Result-Based Payments: | The regulation formalizes result-based payment schemes for verified emission reductions and adaptation outcomes, at international, national, and subnational levels.15 |
| Carbon Levies and Tax: | The regulation provides a legal basis for carbon-related taxes and levies, to be further detailed in sectoral and fiscal regulations.16 Although PR 110/2025 does not itself establish a carbon tax, it complements Indonesia’s broader carbon-pricing architecture, including Law No. 7 of 2021 on Harmonization of Tax Regulations and Minister of Finance Regulation No. 21/PMK.010/2022 which provide the legal basis for a carbon tax on fossil-fuel-based emissions. |
| Other Instruments: | The regulation allows for the development of additional instruments as technology and market needs evolve.17 |
Under PR 98/2021, carbon economic value was essentially a conceptual umbrella. It allowed for instruments such as carbon units and result-based payments but did not structurally distinguish between them. PR 110/2025 replaces this with a clearer classification. Carbon economic value is now implemented through specific instruments and actions such as carbon trading, GHG Emission Trading, GHG Emission Offsetting, Result-Based Payments, carbon levies, and other evolving mechanisms.
This reclassification matters because it provides improved legal clarity for commercial arrangements. For example, an industrial operator seeking to acquire offsets can now map its mitigation strategy with clearly defined regulatory categories, rather than relying on broad or abstract concepts. In the same way, financial institutions can better assess the risk profile of emissions-related investments when legal instruments are properly defined.
PR 110/2025 expands the scope of Indonesia’s NDC sectors and sub-sectors. The addition of the blue carbon sector is both commercially and environmentally significant. Indonesia contains some of the world’s largest mangrove and seagrass ecosystems, and the blue-carbon inclusion creates regulatory recognition for a class of carbon-removal activities that presents substantial international demand potential.
The addition of the oil and gas sub-sector signals Indonesia’s intention to include upstream and midstream emissions within the country’s formal GHG management system. For oil and gas operators, this may eventually translate into more explicit reporting and quota-based obligations, but it also provides opportunities for methane reduction, flare gas capture, and carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects to be formally recognised within the national system and potentially monetized.
A cornerstone of the new framework is the enhancement of Measurement, Reporting, and Verification ("MRV") systems and processes. MRV requirements under PR 98/2021 were kept high-level and left substantial discretion to sectoral ministries. Under PR 110/2025, they are more structured, consistent and tied to registry obligations. PR 110/2025 mandates integrated, transparent, and periodic measurement, reporting, and verification of emissions, mitigation, and adaptation actions.20
The transition from SRN PPI to SRUK for carbon unit registration is aligned with these objectives and aimed to improve traceability and real-time data management.
Under the new registry structure:
We would expect an overarching umbrella regulation as well as implementing ministerial regulations to be issued on this topic to ensure consistent and standardised MRV methodologies across sectors.
A further major innovation introduced by PR 110/2025 is the establishment of a Steering Committee (Komite Pengarah) with a clear mandate to provide policy direction, coordinate efforts across various line ministries, and oversee the implementation of carbon economic value instruments and GHG control.21
The committee is chaired by the Coordinating Minister for Food Affairs (Menteri Koordinator Bidang Pangan)22, with vice-chairs from the economic and infrastructure portfolios, and includes a broad array of relevant ministers and agency heads and must report to the President at least once a year.
As most regulations, PR 110/2025 includes a set of transitional provisions:
As mentioned in the Introduction to the structure of PR 110/2025 (on page 2), this overarching regulation calls for the issuance of certain implementing regulations to provide further detail, processes and requirements on some of the key instruments and measures provided for under the new framework. The Ministry of Forestry is currently preparing a major regulation on Procedures for Carbon Trading in the Forestry Sector which elaborates on the operational implementation of forestry-sector carbon offsets and will establish detailed procedures for registration, validation, verification, and authorization of carbon units (SPE-GRK and non-SPE GRK), emphasizing risk management and coordination between national and international trading mechanisms.
PR 110/2025 marks a clear step forward and improvement of Indonesia’s carbon governance regime. By replacing PR 98/2021, the new regulation provides a more detailed, integrated, and internationally compatible framework, with stronger governance, clearer procedures and, importantly, enhanced opportunities for market participation.
Businesses and other stakeholders across relevant sectors should familiarize themselves with the new requirements to assess their compliance status and, where necessary, proactively engage in the transitional process with the previous regime under PR 98/2021.
For investors and project developers (and their potential lenders), PR 110/2025 is a material development and presents both immediate opportunities and longer-term strategic prospects. It not only signals Indonesia’s commitment to developing a more functional (and active) carbon market, but it also provides regulatory clarity on how carbon units are generated, traded, accounted for, and recognised both domestically and internationally. The new framework creates clearer pathways for participation in both domestic compliance markets and international voluntary markets. Importantly also, the introduction of the concepts and mechanisms of Carbon Allocation and GHG Emission Quotas, the new SRUK registry, expanded sectoral coverage, and enhanced MRV requirements, all contribute to significantly strengthening the integrity and functionality of the system.
PR 110/2025 provides a more robust and coherent legal foundation for current and future decarbonisation projects. While its ultimate success will depend on the issuance of detailed implementing regulations over the next few months and actual implementation and oversight by the relevant line ministries (including through the Steering Committee), PR 110/2025 positions Indonesia as a credible jurisdiction capable of generating high-quality carbon units and participating more actively in global carbon markets.
| Topic | PR 98/2021 | PR 110/2025 |
| Overall approach and regulatory style | Conceptual and policy-oriented framework introducing carbon economic value instruments at a high level, with most operational aspects left to future sectoral regulations. | More detailed, integrated, and market-oriented framework, with clearer operational mechanisms, governance structures, and alignment with international carbon market practices. |
| Role in Indonesia’s climate framework | Served as the initial foundation for carbon pricing and GHG emissions control, without a fully embedded linkage to NDC planning and implementation. | Explicitly aligned with Indonesia’s enhanced NDC commitments, embedding carbon economic value instruments directly into national, sectoral, and sub-national climate planning. |
| Carbon allocation and emissions planning | Did not introduce a unified national carbon allocation mechanism; sectoral emissions limits existed but were fragmented and not synchronized. | Introduces carbon allocation as a core concept, forming the basis for emissions ceilings, sectoral budgets, and compliance planning linked directly to NDC targets. |
| GHG emission quotas | No clear concept of compliance-grade, tradable emission quotas; “upper emission limits” were largely non-operational. | Introduces GHG emission quotas allocated through the carbon allocation framework, functioning as tradable compliance units under an emerging cap-and-trade system. |
| Carbon economic value instruments | Recognised carbon trading, result-based payments, and other instruments in principle, but without clear differentiation or structure. | Provides a clearer and more granular classification of instruments, including emissions trading, offsetting, result-based payments, carbon levies/taxes, and other evolving mechanisms. |
| Carbon trading mechanisms | Allowed for carbon trading in principle, but with limited clarity on trading modalities, bilateral transactions, and market infrastructure. | Explicitly recognises emissions trading and offset trading, permits trading via a carbon exchange or direct transactions, and provides clearer legal certainty for market participants. |
| International carbon trading | Signalled openness to international carbon trading, but lacked a clear legal pathway and created uncertainty around exports, voluntary markets, and timing vis-à-vis NDC achievement and prior ministerial approval. | Establishes explicit authority and pathways for international carbon trading, including for carbon instruments certified under international standards and clearer rules on authorization and corresponding adjustments. |
| Treatment of voluntary carbon markets | Regulatory ambiguity regarding voluntary carbon units and whether international transfers were permitted in practice. | Explicitly recognises international carbon units and voluntary market transactions that do not require corresponding adjustments, reducing uncertainty for project developers and buyers. |
| Carbon unit certification | Provided a general basis for certification of emission reductions, with limited detail on documentation, validation, and use cases. | Introduces more detailed certification rules for SPE-GRK, including clearer documentation requirements (DRAM and DPP) and expanded permitted uses (compliance, voluntary offsetting, reporting). |
| Carbon registry system | Relied on the SRN-PPI, which combined NDC tracking and carbon unit registration, leading to practical and institutional complexity. | Introduces the SRUK as a dedicated carbon unit registry, separate from NDC tracking, with a focus on transparency, traceability, and interoperability with international systems. |
| Measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) | MRV requirements were high-level and largely delegated to sectoral ministries, resulting in inconsistent application. | Strengthens and integrates MRV requirements, linking them more directly to registry obligations, compliance mechanisms, and national reporting. |
| Institutional governance | Governance responsibilities were dispersed across multiple ministries, with limited central coordination. | Establishes a cross-ministerial Steering Committee with a formal mandate to coordinate, supervise, and report on carbon economic value instruments and GHG control. |
| Sectoral coverage | Covered key sectors but with a narrower scope and less explicit recognition of emerging mitigation areas. | Expands sectoral and sub-sectoral coverage, including blue carbon and oil and gas, broadening both compliance obligations and market opportunities. |
| Carbon levies and taxes | Recognised carbon levies/taxes in principle but without strong integration into the broader carbon pricing architecture. | Reinforces the legal basis for carbon levies and taxes as part of a coherent carbon pricing framework, aligned with tax legislation and future fiscal measures. |
| Regulatory certainty for investors | Left significant uncertainty due to reliance on future implementing regulations and limited operational clarity. | Provides greater legal certainty through clearer structures, defined instruments, and transitional arrangements, improving investor and lender confidence. |
Other Author: Rachelia Jumanti (Associate)
Oentoeng Suria & Partners (OSP) is an Indonesian firm affiliated with Ashurst, a global law firm. The Ashurst Group comprises Ashurst LLP, Ashurst Australia and their respective affiliates (including independent local partnerships, companies or other entities) which are authorised to use the name "Ashurst" or describe themselves as being affiliated with Ashurst, such as OSP. Some members of the Ashurst Group are limited liability entities. Information about OSP can be found in www.oentoengsuria.com, and further information on which Ashurst Group entity operates in any country can be found on our website at www.ashurst.com.
This material is current as at 23 December 2025 but does not take into account any developments to the law after that date. It is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and in practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to, and does not constitute legal advice. The information provided is general in nature, and does not take into account and is not intended to apply to any specific issues or circumstances. Readers should take independent legal advice. No part of this publication may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from Ashurst. While we use reasonable skill and care in the preparation of this material, we accept no liability for use of and reliance upon it by any person.