Consulting on regulating digital asset platforms and tokenised custody platforms – new financial products, new obligations, and opportunities for tokenisation
28 October 2025
28 October 2025
On 25 September 2025, Commonwealth Treasury commenced consultation on proposals to regulate digital asset platforms and tokenised custody platforms within Australia's financial services regulatory framework.
The proposed amendments draw upon the principle of ‘same activity, same risk, same regulation’. If passed in their current form, these would adapt Australia's existing financial regulatory framework to capture many in the digital asset sector, providing long awaited clarity and certainty to the industry. It would also set out a framework for issuance of digital twin style tokens, providing a clear pathway for tokenisation of real-world assets, including traditional financial products.
The proposed amendments to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) are set out in the Exposure Draft Bill Treasury Laws Amendment Bill 2025: Digital asset, and tokenised custody, platforms (Exposure Draft) and propose to (amongst other things):
If passed, these would apply in addition to existing obligations under Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act, subject to a few new exemptions. These proposals will likely impact every person providing services in relation to digital assets and distributed ledger technology, as well as those in traditional financial services and markets who may engage with providers in this space, or the underlying technology. Further detail of these reforms, including who is likely to be captured, is set out below.
Treasury is actively consulting on these proposals until 24 October 2025. If you would like to discuss this at any time, we would be delighted to do so.
These reforms are not happening in a vacuum. On 9 October 2025, Treasury released a separate consultation on Exposure Draft Treasury Laws Amendment Bill 2025: Payments System Modernisation— amendment of the Corporations Act 2001. This includes a proposal to regulate tokenised stored value facilities as a financial product. This does not propose to regulate the 'stablecoin' token under the stored value facility financial product. Rather, if passed, it would bring the facility through which stablecoins are issued and redeemed (but not the token) into our regulatory perimeter. Further detail regarding these reforms is set out in our alert here.
The Exposure Draft provides an in-depth proposal to bring intermediaries in the digital asset sector within scope of our financial services framework.
To bring certain digital asset service providers into the regulatory framework, the Exposure Draft proposes to:
The following table sets out who is intended to be captured as part of the new financial products.
| Term | Definitions | Further details | Example |
| Digital asset platform (s761GC) | a non-transferable facility under which a person (the operator) possesses one or more digital tokens (underlying assets) on trust for or on behalf of another person (the client), or another person nominated by the client (client nominee). | This includes both providing custody of digital tokens, and those that also facilitate the use of a client’s digital tokens within the platform. Note that the operator of a digital asset platform is the issuer of the platform. They are also a custodian of the underlying assets. |
|
| tokenised custody platform (s761GD) |
a non-transferable facility under which: (a) a person (the operator) identifies one or more assets (underlying assets); (b) for each underlying asset, the operator creates a single digital token, possession of which confers a right to redeem, or direct the delivery of, the underlying asset; and (c) the operator holds each underlying asset on trust for, or on behalf of, a person who possesses that digital token. Note that an asset is broadly defined to include property and can include a digital token, or any other asset, including a financial product not in tokenised form. There must be a one-to-one relationship between the underlying asset and the digital token and underlying assets must be redeemed on a one-to-one basis. This is not intended to be used for as a vehicle to issue fractionalised interests in underlying assets. |
This is intended to capture both tokenised custody platforms that only provide custody and tokenisation of underlying assets as well as those that facilitate the purchase or sale of underlying assets or other use of underlying assets within the platform. Note that the operator of a tokenised custody platform is the issuer of the platform. They are also a custodian of the underlying assets. |
|
The proposals in the Exposure Draft are designed to tailor obligations under Australia's existing financial services regime regarding licensing and conduct to those providing financial services in relation to TCPs and DAPs, subject to additional standards and exemptions from certain obligations. This is intended to reflect the specific risks and functions of these products, and leverage the existing established concepts in financial services regulation.
The tailored obligations include:
The Exposure Draft proposes to tailor disclosure requirements for DAP and TCP by requiring:
This is intended to reflect the specific risks and functions of these products, and leverage the existing established concepts in financial services regulation.
These proposals are designed to be flexible and adapt to changes in the nature of assets, how they are made available, emerging financial stability risks and investor protection concerns which may arise.
To account for this, the Exposure Draft proposed to give the Minister power to make the following declarations:
With respect to clearing and settlement facilities and financial markets, these reflect that in some circumstances, there is a risk that a DAP or TCP may be a clearing and settlement facility, or a financial market.
A responsible person has 6 months following commencement to apply to ASIC to grant an AFSL or vary the conditions of an AFSL. Once lodged within this period, the amendments do not apply until the earliest of:
OR
To facilitate this, the proposals also introduce the following exemptions which are intended to provide greater certainty about the effect and application of the financial services law:
These reforms are designed to mitigate the risks and harms associated with custodial arrangements in the digital asset space and the reliance consumers place on different types of intermediaries in this sector. In applying the principal of 'same risk same regulation', the proposals draw on regulation of similar activities such as custodians, managed investment schemes, investor-directed portfolio services (IDPS), financial markets and clearing and settlement facilities.
These proposals will likely impact every person providing services in relation to digital assets and distributed ledger technology, as well as those in traditional financial services and markets who may engage with providers in this space, or the underlying technology.
In particular, the following persons may be impacted by these proposals:
As such, we recommend all who currently or are looking to undertake activities connected to digital assets (including tokenised traditional assets), engage with these reforms.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.