Legal development

Ashurst Governance & Compliance Update – Issue 71

spiral background

    Equity Capital Markets

    1. PISCES: Updated Admission and Disclosure Standards and Rules of the London Stock Exchange for new Private Securities Market

    The London Stock Exchange has published amended versions of its Admission and Disclosure Standards and Rules of the London Stock Exchange. The rulebooks have been updated to reflect the creation of the Exchange's new Private Securities Market (PSM) - a Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System (PISCES) established under the PISCES Regulations. The amendments are as proposed in August in Market Notice N09/25. The updated rulebooks are now in force.

    In addition to amendments to its existing rulebooks, in August the Exchange also published the following draft rulebooks for the PSM:

    • PSM Rules: a new rulebook for companies seeking to join the PSM; and
    • PSM Handbook: a new rulebook relating to compliance, actions, decisions and appeals under the PSM Rules.

    Whilst the updates to the Exchange's existing rulebooks have now taken effect as originally proposed, responses in relation to the consultation on the new PSM rulebooks are being considered and an update will be provided in due course. The Exchange is yet to provide a specific launch date for the PSM, although this is expected later this year.

    The Exchange is the first operator to be granted a PISCES Approval Notice by the Financial Conduct Authority. It will operate the PSM as a recognised investment exchange, using its existing trading infrastructure to enable private companies to facilitate trading of their securities at intervals through an auction facility.

    Further information on PISCES can be found in our snapshot, client update and podcast.

    2. FCA publishes Market Watch 83 with a focus on advisers' handling of inside information

    The Financial Conduct Authority has published Market Watch 83 in which it sets out its observations on corporate finance firms’ systems and controls for handling inside information about their corporate clients. In turn, these observations will be of interest to those responsible within issuers for disclosure policies and systems and procedures relating to UK MAR generally.

    Over a five-year period, the FCA undertook a series of ‘deep dive’ UK MAR systems and controls reviews of firms that provide advisory and corporate broking services to small and mid-cap companies. In this Market Watch, the FCA comments on market practices identified in its reviews and areas where it saw a heightened risk, focusing on market soundings, the control environment and personal account dealing.

    The FCA's aim in sharing its observations is to help firms benchmark their systems and controls and consider whether their arrangements align with the FCA's expected standards.

    Market soundings

    The FCA's observations on market soundings include the following:

    (a) Managing the number of Market Sounding Recipients (MSRs)

    The FCA notes that the number of MSRs that a firm contacts in the context of a market sounding will vary depending on the transaction, and typically a broker acting as the Disclosing Market Participant (DMP) will work with the issuer to identify the investors or types of investors that need to be contacted to facilitate the particular transaction.

    In its reviews, the FCA saw DMPs extending their market soundings to a relatively large number of MSRs without a process for considering the appropriateness or the number of MSRs contacted. As a result, the FCA encourages firms to consider whether their policies and procedures effectively manage the number of MSRs in order to control the flow of inside information.

    (b) Risk of unlawfully disclosing inside information during a market sounding

    In the context of gatekeeper arrangements where gatekeepers are the first point of contact for DMPs to approach and request consent to undertake a market sounding, the FCA identified a specific risk of unlawful disclosure after the DMP has received consent from the gatekeeper to undertake the sounding. The FCA references examples of DMPs sharing information with individuals at the MSR via e-mail and the list of recipients on the e-mail chain expanding without obvious control over who was added. The FCA highlights that DMPs and MSRs should consider and address the risk of unlawfully disclosing inside information as a result of sharing market sounding information with individuals at a MSR who have not been wall-crossed.

    (c) Sharing a standard set of deal-specific information

    The FCA observed varying practices for identifying and agreeing the deal-specific information to share with the MSR, noting that UK MAR Technical Standard 2016/960 requires the DMP to ensure all potential investors sounded receive the same level of information.

    The FCA stresses that firms’ policies and procedures should make sure the same level of information is shared with every MSR. Best practice involved the DMP using an approved script for all market soundings, which helped to minimise differences in information shared.

    Control environment

    The FCA also highlights that firms should conduct a regular review of their systems and controls, considering factors such as whether they are proportionate to the nature, scale and complexity of their business. An example of good practice in this context was having structures in place, including oversight of compliance by the board, an internal committee or an external compliance consultant.

    3. Aquis consults on launch of Aquis Support Services

    Aquis Stock Exchange has published a consultation on the introduction of a new service - Aquis Support Services – to help companies comply with their continuing obligations under the Aquis Growth Market rulebooks. By way of reminder, the Aquis Stock Exchange is a junior marketplace which is designed specifically for growth enterprises.

    To address feedback on whether the responsibilities of the corporate adviser following admission remain appropriate, the new product offering introduces an alternative to the retained corporate adviser. To implement this flexibility for issuers, the Aquis Growth Market Rulebooks will be amended to allow for an admitted company to elect to retain a corporate adviser on an ongoing basis or utilise Aquis Support Services. Admitted companies electing to utilise Acquis Support Services will receive direct support from a participating law firm.

    The consultation follows the London Stock Exchange's Discussion Paper – Shaping the Future of AIM in which market engagement was sought to support the continued development of AIM, including proposals to streamline the nominated adviser role with a view to reducing unnecessary frictions and costs for companies. For an overview of the Discussion Paper, see AGC Update, Issue 64 – Item 9.

    A number of other minor amendments are proposed to the Aquis Growth Market Rulebooks. Responses to the consultation are requested by 31 October 2025 and it is envisaged that revisions to the Rulebooks will come into effect in November 2025.

    4. Share buyback reporting – FCA consults on rulebook changes

    The FCA has published Quarterly Consultation CP25/24 in which it is consulting on various amendments to the FCA Handbook, including share buyback reporting obligations under UKLR 9.

    In response to feedback from the FCA's listing reforms consultation process and its multi-firm review on share buybacks (see AGC update, Issue 7 - Item 8), the FCA is proposing to amend the deadline for notifying the market about share buyback transactions in UKLR 9.6.6R so that it is aligned with the deadline in article 2(3) of the UK Buyback and Stabilisation Regulation.

    Under UKLR 9.6.6R, listed companies are required to notify purchases of own shares as soon as possible, and in any event no later than 7.30 am on the next business day after the day on which the purchase occurred. The proposed amendment would require notification to be made by the end of the seventh daily market session following the date of execution of such purchase. The FCA is not proposing to change the nature of the information to be disclosed under UKLR 9.6.6R.

    In relation to the FCA's proposal to use the same terminology for the deadline as is used in article 2(3) of the UK Buyback and Stabilisation Regulation, the FCA is interested in views on whether this is helpful or requires further explanation, as well as how the market currently interprets ‘daily market sessions'.

    Comments on the consultation should be submitted by 15 October 2025.

    5. Dividends: LSE publishes 2026 Dividend Procedure Timetable

    The London Stock Exchange has published its Dividend Procedure Timetable 2026. By way of reminder, the Dividend Procedure Timetable is published annually as a guide for companies with shares listed on the LSE's Main Market or admitted to trading on AIM on setting their interim and final dividend programmes. Where an issuer’s dividend timetable does not follow the Dividend Procedure Timetable, that dividend timetable must be approved by the LSE’s Corporate Actions team in advance of the announcement of the dividend in accordance with the Admission and Disclosure Standards.

    As in the past, the latest timetable sets out a series of ex-dividend dates, its associated record date and the corresponding latest announcement date.

    The LSE also reminds issuers that dividend information must be disseminated under the correct announcement headline category: dividends can be announced as part of an Interim or Final Results announcement, or under the headline category 'Dividend Declaration'.

     FCA launches new Handbook website

    The FCA has launched its new Handbook website following a period of beta testing. No changes have been made to the structure or content of the Handbook as part of the website redesign and the previous Handbook website will remain live for a short period. Both versions will be updated as usual.

    The new Handbook website is intended to offer improved functionality and ease of navigation. To that end, the FCA has published video guides to supplement its User Guides for the new website.

    7. FCA publishes details of its arrangements for Christmas and New Year 2025/26

    The FCA has published details of its approach to reviewing and processing listing applications over the Christmas and New Year period 2025/26. This includes the process for listing hearings.

    Narrative and Financial Reporting

    8.  FRC publishes Annual Review of Corporate Reporting

    The Financial Reporting Council has published its Annual Review of Corporate Reporting for the 2024/25 monitoring cycle. The report provides information that is particularly relevant to preparers and auditors of financial statements, as well as investors.

    Example disclosure which represent good quality application of reporting requirements that companies should consider when preparing their annual reports and accounts are included. The review concludes with a helpful reminder of prospective changes to the reporting environment.

    Overview of findings

    The Corporate Reporting Review (CRR) team found that a lower proportion of reviews resulted in queries being raised with companies compared to previous years, with overall restatements prompted by reviews falling compared to the previous three years. The number of restatements affecting profit also reduced.

    For the third consecutive year, impairment was the issue most frequently raised with companies, although no companies were required to restate their accounts for impairment matters. Cash flow statements and inconsistency of information between financial statements and other sections of the report and accounts continue to present challenges. The report notes that many common areas of challenge could be identified through sufficiently robust pre-issuance reviews, emphasising this remains a key expectation for companies' oversight processes.

    There remains a quality gap between companies in the FTSE 350 and other companies, with the majority of restatements continuing to arise in companies outside the FTSE 350. By way of reminder, the FRC is undertaking a thematic review focusing specifically on reporting by UK smaller listed companies.

    Monitoring activities

    In undertaking its work, the CRR continued to challenge itself on the application of proportionality in reporting.

    Fewer reviews of annual reports were performed in the year (222 in 2024/25; compared with 243 in 2023/24), partly due to resource constraints at the FRC and a higher proportion of reviews being 'full scope'. The FRC expects the number of reviews to be back to the 240-260 range in 2025/2026. For the second year, the proportion of reviews of FTSE 350 companies was below 50% (38% in 2024/25; compared with 40% in 2023/24).

    'Substantive letters' requiring additional information or explanations from companies decreased in the year (37% in 2024/25, compared with 47% in 2023/24), however there remains a significant gap between the quality of FTSE 350 reporting and that of other companies.

    'Required references' to CRR reviews in a company's next annual report when more significant changes are needed as a result of FRC intervention (typically where a company restates comparative information in primary financial statements) were also down to 18 (2023/24: 26).

    Top ten issues raised with companies

    The top ten issues raised with companies as part of monitoring activity in 2024/25 were:

    1. Impairment of assets
    2. Cash flow statements
    3. Use of financial instruments
    4. Presentation of financial information
    5. Revenue
    6. Disclosures in strategic reports and Companies Act 2006 issues
    7. Judgements and estimates
    8. Income taxes
    9. Consolidated financial statements (new entrant for 2024/25)
    10. TCFD, CFD and climate-related narrative reporting

    Key narrative reporting and corporate law-related issues raised

    As regards strategic reports and other Companies Act 2006 matters, the FRC:

    • queried the lawfulness of dividends which were not supported by the company's last audited accounts or where interim accounts had not been filed at Companies House;
    • asked questions in relation to significant differences between the share premium balance disclosed in the consolidated and parent company financial statements, and the timing of the recognition of a distribution;
    • asked companies for more information when the description of the business model and strategy in the strategic report disclosure was unclear and where a parent company heading a large group had taken advantage of the small companies' exemption from presenting a strategic report; and
    • reminds reporting teams to refer back to the basic expectations for the strategic report, including those for quoted companies, as well as the statutory requirements for the payment of dividends.

    As regards judgments and estimates, the FRC questioned companies when the information provided did not cover all aspects of the factors that the directors would have been reasonably expected to consider in making a judgement.

    As regards TCFD, CFD and climate-related financial reporting, the FRC:

    • states that it continues to work with the FCA in relation to TCFD reporting in line with the supervisory strategy explained in Primary Market Bulletin 36 whilst reviewing for the first time the extent of compliance with Climate-related Financial Disclosures (CFD);
    • raised fewer substantive queries in respect of such reporting than last year, with most questions being raised in relation to AIM and larger private companies;
    • questioned companies that did not provide a qualitative or a quantitative analysis of the resilience of the company’s business model and strategy considering different climate-related scenarios in line with the CFD requirements and challenged a parent company that headed a large group that incorrectly applied the small companies’ exemption from presenting a strategic report (including the CFD disclosures); and
    • asked a company to explain an apparent inconsistency between the reporting boundary used for its principal greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions target disclosed under the TCFD framework, and that for GHG data reported elsewhere in the annual report and accounts, and to confirm the basis of calculation of this target.

    Expectations for 2025/26

    For the 2025/26 reporting season, expectations remain consistent with recent years given stable reporting requirements and recurring themes. Companies are encouraged to focus on improving explanations of significant judgements and estimates, including disclosure of key inputs and assumptions.

    The FRC also continues to encourage the use of pre-issuance checks on annual reports given that many questions, corrections and restatements could be avoided if reports were reviewed against the top ten issues of challenge set out above.

    The FRC reminds reporters to ensure the strategic report includes a fair, balanced and comprehensive review of the company’s development, position, performance and future prospects and to take care to comply with the applicable climate-related reporting requirements, ensuring disclosures are concise and that material information is not obscured.

    Ultimately the FRC encourage reporting teams to take a step back and consider whether the annual report and accounts as a whole:

    • tells a consistent and coherent story throughout the narrative reporting and financial statements;
    • is clear, concise and understandable;
    • includes all material and relevant information, including information not specifically required by standards, where it is necessary for users’ understanding; and
    • includes only material and relevant information – good quality reporting does not necessarily require a greater volume of disclosure.

    Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Update

    9. Identity verification

    As we have previously reported, the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 has introduced mandatory identity verification with effect from 18 November 2025. Most recently, in AGC Update, Issue 70 – Item 1 we reported on the implications of identity verification (IDV) for new and existing directors, LLP members and persons with significant control (PSC) of companies or LLPs. The extension of the IDV regime to LLP members and PSCs of LLPs has been brought about by the Limited Liability Partnerships (Application and Modification of Company Law) Regulations 2025.

    Once a person has verified their identity, Companies House will issue them with a 11 digit code that is personal to the person and not the person's company or LLP. On 1 September 2025, Companies House published guidance about personal codes which is accessible by clicking here.

    Individuals who have verified their identity by using the Gov.UK One Login app will be able to view their code by signing in to their account at Companies House. For individuals who have verified their identity and received their personal code with the help of an authorised corporate service provider, the guidance recommends saving the personal code to a Companies House account for easier storage and retrieval.

    10. Statutory registers

    We also reported in AGC Update, Issue 70 that ECCTA removes the requirement for companies to maintain their own versions of certain statutory registers, such as those relating to directors, secretaries and PSCs. This information must instead be reported directly to Companies House, which will hold central registers. These changes are brought about by the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (Consequential, Incidental and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations 2025.

    The existing requirements for LLPs to keep local registers of information relating to their members and PSCs will also be replaced and such information will also be held centrally at Companies House. This change is brought about by the Limited Liability Partnerships (Application and Modification of Company Law) Regulations 2025.

    Information about the PSCs of companies and LLPs must be reported directly to Companies House, this change being brought about by the Register of People with Significant Control (Amendment) Regulations 2025.

    The changes to the statutory registers regime highlighted above are expected to come into force on 18 November 2025.

    11. Register of Overseas Entities

    The Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 established the Register of Overseas Entities (ROE) in August 2022, to enhance transparency regarding the beneficial ownership of overseas entities holding land in the UK. Companies House has issued the Register of Overseas Entities Rules 2025 which specify how documents to be filed at Companies House in connection with the ROE should be delivered and authenticated. The rules were made, and came into force, on 16 September 2025.

    12. Access to WebFiling accounts to move to GOV.UK One Login

    Companies House has announced that, from 13 October 2025, its WebFiling service will only be accessible via GOV.UK One Login. From this date, users signing into WebFiling will be redirected to connect their accounts to GOV.UK One Login. Anyone who shares access to a WebFiling account will need to create their own GOV.UK One Login, using a different email address, and will no longer be able to access information in the shared account.

    Corporate Crime

    13. HM Treasury publishes policy note and draft amendments to the Money Laundering Regulations

    HM Treasury has published a draft statutory instrument and policy note on proposed amendments to the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017. HM Treasury's consultation on the technical effectiveness and practical implementation of amendments closes on 30 September 2025, with the final instrument expected to be laid before Parliament in early 2026.

    The proposed amendments aim to deliver a more risk-based, proportionate regime that addresses concerns around regulatory loopholes, proportionality and evolving risks. There are three key areas to be aware of:

    • Clarifying due diligence requirements

      Under the proposals, the definition of "high-risk third countries" – which trigger a requirement for Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) for money laundering purposes – will be limited to countries on the Financial Action Taskforce's (FATF) "call for action" list. Countries on FATF's "increased monitoring" list will no longer be within the definition of "high-risk third countries" that trigger an EDD requirement.

      The amendments also clarify that EDD is only required in relation to "unusually complex or unusually large" transactions (relative to the sector or nature of the transaction), which refines the previous requirement to apply EDD to all “complex or unusually large” transactions. Clarifying amendments are also proposed to the customer due diligence triggers for certain businesses (e.g. art market participants), including in relation to Pooled Client Accounts.
    • Information sharing and system coordination

      The amendments seek to strengthen cooperation between AML supervisory bodies and other public bodies, by bringing Companies House and the Financial Regulators Complaints Commissioner into the scope of existing information sharing provisions.
    • Aligning due diligence requirements

      Compliance with the regulations will be simplified by converting all monetary thresholds from euros to sterling to reflect the UK market, and aligning the criteria for registration and change in control for cryptoasset firms with those under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. Trust and Company Service Providers that sell off-the-shelf firms will also be brought into scope of the MLRs and will therefore be required to conduct customer due diligence and ongoing monitoring.

    Audit

    14. Financial Reporting Council launches programme to build capability and support growth in small UK audit firms

    The Financial Reporting Council has announced a new initiative to support the development of capability and quality management by small audit firms looking to establish a greater presence in the UK Public Interest Entity (PIE) audit market. This initiative will introduce a new and more proportionate supervisory approach, designed to enhance audit quality and reflect the unique needs of smaller firms.

    If you would like to receive future Ashurst Governance & Compliance updates, please click here to sign up.

    Authors: Will Chalk, Partner; Neil Donovan, Partner, Shan Shori, Expertise Counsel; Becky Clissmann, Sustainability Counsel; Anthony Asindi, Senior Associate; Marianna Kennedy, Senior Associate

    The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
    Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.