How can employers close their gender pay gap?
Employers in Great Britain with at least 250 employees are now required to publish data on their gender pay gap on a publicly-available website. The final date for the publication of the first set of data was 4 April 2018 and the figures must be updated annually.
Having to collect and publish hard data has been useful in crystallising for many employers the fact that they have a significant gender pay gap. In fact, almost eight out of ten employers who published their first set of data by the deadline were found to pay men more than women, in some cases by a very significant margin. Apart from the potential reputational implications, this can be damaging for staff morale and recruitment, particularly where comparisons with employers in the same sector are unfavourable.
So the question for many employers now is how can they close their gender pay gap. The starting point is for each organisation to analyse its own data and identify the specific reasons why it has such a gap. While an element of straightforward discrimination cannot be ruled out, in most cases the gender pay gap stems from more subtle influences and a range of remedies will be needed to close that gap.
We identify below the key areas which employers need to address and suggest a number of action points to consider. Most are not legal requirements and some may involve a sea change in culture. Not all will be feasible but we hope they will be helpful in generating discussion.
1. Recruitment |
---|
|
2. flexible working |
---|
|
3. parental leave |
---|
|
4. Pay and bonuses |
---|
|
5. advancement |
---|
|
Key Contacts
We bring together lawyers of the highest calibre with the technical knowledge, industry experience and regional know-how to provide the incisive advice our clients need.
Keep up to date
Sign up to receive the latest legal developments, insights and news from Ashurst. By signing up, you agree to receive commercial messages from us. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Sign upThe information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.