Canned vegetable cartelists fined
This article is part of the October 2019 edition of our competition newsletter, focusing on some recent key competition developments.
On 27 September 2019, the European Commission ("Commission") fined Coroos and Groupe CECAB €31.65 million for participating in a canned vegetables cartel for over 13 years, with a third participant, Bonduelle, receiving full immunity for blowing the whistle.
what you need to know - key takeaways |
---|
|
On 27 September 2019, the Commission fined Coroos and Groupe CECAB €13.65 million and €18 million respectively for breaching the Article 101 TFEU prohibition on cartels. A third participant in the cartel, Bonduelle, received full immunity for revealing the existence of the cartel to the Commission, avoiding a fine in the region of €250 million. All three companies admitted their involvement and settled the case.
The cartel
The cartel involved a single infringement comprising three separate agreements relating to:
- private label sales of canned vegetables such as green beans, peas, peas-and-carrots mix to retailers in the EEA;
- private label sales of canned sweetcorn to retailers in the EEA; and
- both own-brand and private label sales (sold under retailer's brands) of canned vegetables to retailers and food service industry specifically in France.
Coroos participated in only the first agreement, while Bonduelle and Group CECAB participated in all three.
The cartel lasted over 13 years, from 2000 to 2013, and covered the entire EEA. As part of this cartel, the companies engaged in conduct such as setting prices, agreeing market shares and volume quotas, allocating customers and markets, coordinating replies to tenders and exchanging commercially sensitive information.
The Commission had also opened proceedings against a fourth company, Conserve Italia in relation to this investigation. Conserve Italia is not covered by the settlement decision and the investigation against it will continue under the standard (non-settlement) cartel procedure.
The fines
Applying its 2006 Leniency Notice, the Commission granted Bondeulle full immunity for revealing the existence of the cartel, allowing it to avoid fine of approximately €250 million. Coroos and Group CECAB received a 15% and 30% discount respectively. In addition, both Coroos and Group CECAB received a further 10% discount each for settlement, under the Commission's 2008 Settlement Notice, resulting in a €13,647,000 and €18,000,000 fine for Coroos and Groupe CECAB respectively.
The Commission's press release states that one of the companies also received a further discount after invoking its inability to pay the fine under point 35 of the 2006 Guidelines on fines. In deciding to grant this discount, the Commission thoroughly assessed the company's financial statements for recent years, projections for the current and coming years, ratios measuring the financial strength, profitability, solvency, liquidity, and relations with outside financial partners and with shareholders.
This is the Commission's second cartel case relating to canned foodstuffs in recent years. In June 2014, the Commssion fined Bonduelle, Lutèce and Prochamp a total of around €32 million, in a settlement decision relating to a canned mushrooms cartel. In April 2016, it fined Riberebro (which did not settle) €5.2 million in relation to the same cartel.
With thanks to Natasha Gromof of Ashurst for her contribution.
Contents
- Belgian authority fines pharmacist body for limiting advertising and rebates
- Broadcom imposed first Commission interim measures in 18 years
- Canned vegetable cartelists fined
- CMA fines three construction firms £36 million for cartel conduct
- ECJ upholds Commission inspections following privilege issue
- FCA Stihl sanction for online sales ban confirmed on appeal
- K-Line receives $34.5 million fine for criminal cartel conduct
- Procter & Gamble, Coty, Chanel and two wholesalers fined for exclusive overseas import agreements
- Protection of whistle-blowers: new EU-wide rules to come into force in 2021
- CNMC fines 19 assembly and maintenance companies for bid-rigging
Keep up to date
Sign up to receive the latest legal developments, insights and news from Ashurst. By signing up, you agree to receive commercial messages from us. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Sign upThe information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.