Belgian law on abuse of economic dependence now in force
This article is part of the September 2020 edition of our competition law newsletter, focusing on some recent key developments.
The prohibition of abuses of economic dependence, as recently introduced into Belgian competition law (see Ashurst's April 2019 newsletter article here), is now in force.
Background
A Royal Decree amending the Belgian Code of Economic Law with regard to the prohibition of abuses of economic dependence was published in the Official Journal of Belgium on 12 August 2020. This Royal decree confirms the competence of the Belgian Competition Authority ("BCA") to enforce the prohibition and sanction companies abusing the economic dependence of other firms with fines of up to 2% of a company's worldwide turnover. Companies suffering such abuses can submit a complaint to the BCA's investigation service.
With this new law, the Belgian lawmaker intends to protect, in particular, small and medium-sized companies from unfair practices by other companies that are indispensable trading partners for them. Relationships between food producers and supermarket chains, as well as between franchisers and franchisees, were cited as examples of relationships susceptible to such abuses. However, the prohibition has a much wider reach and could potentially apply to a lot of operators across various economic sectors such as, for example, digital platforms, sport associations or infrastructure managers acting as 'gatekeepers' in certain markets.
The prohibition
The application of the prohibition is subject to three conditions. For the prohibition to apply there must to be evidence of:
- a relationship of economic dependence;
- an abuse; and
- an actual or potential impact on competition in the Belgian market (or a substantial part thereof).
Economic dependence
According to the law, a company is in a position of economic dependence if it is dependent on one or more other companies to carry out its activities and there is no "reasonably equivalent alternatives available within a reasonable period of time, on reasonable terms and at reasonable costs". Whether or not a company depends on another will likely be assessed, in each case, on the basis of concrete elements pertaining to their business relationship and the broader market context, including such factors as:
- the market share of the company alleged to be an indispensable trading partner;
- whether or not that company accounts for a significant share of the sales or purchases of the its allegedly 'dependent' partner;
- whether the former company holds indispensable knowhow or technology, or an indispensable input or infrastructure of any kind;
- that company's brand reputation;
- the possibility for suppliers or customers to switch.
Abuse
The notion of abuse is defined in the same manner as under the prohibition of abuses of dominance, allowing the BCA to rely on existing antitrust case-law. Accordingly, it is likely that all types of conduct which may potentially be regarded as an abuse of dominance will also be capable of giving rise to an abuse of economic dependence. The law broadly clarifies that abusive conduct may consist of imposing "services or conditions that could not be obtained under normal market circumstances."
With thanks to Antoine Accarain of Ashurst for his contribution.
Contents
- The potential future of EU antitrust rules on vertical agreements - Commission's evaluation
- ECJ rejects power cables appeals on dawn raid powers and successor liability
- Commission fines car parts suppliers €18 million in cartel settlement
- Belgian law on abuse of economic dependence now in force
- Divestments overcome strong competition concerns with pharmaceutical merger
- HealthEngine fined $2.9m for misleading reviews and patient referrals
- France issues first ever deal block - E.Leclerc-Géant Casino local hypermarket deal
- €444m French pharma sector fine for rare collective abuse of a dominance infringement
- Italian broadcasting and audiovisual acquisitions law contrary to EU freedom of establishment principles
- JD Sports and Amazon fined for breach of UK merger control procedural rules
- CMA open letter to the weddings sector
- Enforcement action against four housing developers and advice on leasehold properties
Key Contacts
We bring together lawyers of the highest calibre with the technical knowledge, industry experience and regional know-how to provide the incisive advice our clients need.
Keep up to date
Sign up to receive the latest legal developments, insights and news from Ashurst. By signing up, you agree to receive commercial messages from us. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Sign upThe information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.