Event ticket reseller viagogo fined $7m for misleading consumers
This article is part of the November 2020 edition of our competition law newsletter, focusing on some recent key developments.
On 2 October 2020, the Federal Court of Australia ordered viagogo AG ("viagogo"), a Swiss-based company, to pay a pecuniary penalty of AUD 7 million for making false or misleading representations when reselling event tickets, in contravention of the Australian Consumer Law ("ACL").
The Court found that viagogo made a number of misrepresentations in contravention of the ACL:
- viagogo marketing itself as an "official" seller when it was in fact a platform for second-hand sales;
- viagogo representing that tickets were selling fast or that quantities were limited, without adequately disclosing that this referred only to quantities available on its website, not to the event itself; and
- viagogo advertising low prices to draw in consumers when the true price included additional fees, and not prominently specifying the total fee payable alongside the low price.
The Court also ordered an injunction, restraining viagogo for five years from making similar representations, and that viagogo implement and maintain an ACL compliance program.
what you need to know - key takeaways when conducting business in australia |
---|
|
Official Site Representation
Viagogo's use of the phrase "Buy Now, viagogo Official Site" was found to be misleading because an ordinary consumer would understand this phrase to mean that official original event tickets could be purchased from viagogo, or that viagogo was affiliated with the event host, when the tickets available were actually being resold.
The Court characterised this as a "very serious" misrepresentation as it "fundamentally misled consumers as to the nature of viagogo's business". A penalty of AUD 2.5 million was imposed for this conduct.
Quantity representation
viagogo's website repeatedly displayed statements such as "Only five tickets remaining!", "Tickets are likely to sell out soon" and "Last chance!". The Court found that an ordinary consumer would understand this as referring to the scarcity of tickets available for the event overall, when such representations were actually referring to the tickets being sold only on viagogo.
The Court considered that the effect of this conduct was to distract consumers from the inadequate disclaimers on viagogo's website and hurry customers along. The Court described the misrepresentations as being on "an industrial scale", noting that they would not have escaped the attention of any consumers due to the frequency and the manner in which they appeared. A penalty of AUD 2.5 million was imposed for this conduct.
Total Price representation
The Court found that viagogo had misrepresented that consumers could purchase a ticket for a stated price when in fact additional fees needed to be paid to viagogo.
By making the misrepresentation at the start of the purchasing process, the Court considered that viagogo "seduced" customers with a misleading impression. The Court acknowledged that the customer eventually learned the true price on the final page but by then, the customer had invested significant time navigating the booking process. A penalty of AUD 1.5 million was imposed for this conduct.
Part Price representation
The Court found that viagogo made a part-price representation in contravention of the ACL by stating on its 'Delivery Page' a price for tickets that excluded further fees payable, without also prominently specifying as a single figure, the price for each ticket that included the additional fees.
The Court noted that consumers were drawn further into the transaction as a result. However, the ACCC's case was based on only three transactions and the conduct was of a limited duration. A penalty of AUD 500,000 was imposed for this conduct.
With thanks to Andrew McClenahan and Karen Zhong of Ashurst for their contributions.
Contents
- General Court partially annuls inspection orders
- HeidelbergCement and Schwenk fail to overturn Commission cement merger prohibition
- Commission accepts Broadcom's offer to stop exclusivity on chipset markets
- EU FDI Screening Regulation goes live
- iSelect penalised $8.5m for misleading consumers comparing energy plans
- Event ticket reseller viagogo fined $7m for misleading consumers
- Paris Court of Appeal upholds interim measures order on Google
- Energy companies fined for gun-jumping in Italy
- Singapore e-commerce platforms market study recommends update to competition guidelines
- Spanish High Court rejects appeal against Land Rover dealer cartel
- CMA consumer law push continues - Care UK to refund unfair "shortfall" fees
- £203m in COVID-19 refunds for Virgin Holidays customers
Key Contacts
We bring together lawyers of the highest calibre with the technical knowledge, industry experience and regional know-how to provide the incisive advice our clients need.
Keep up to date
Sign up to receive the latest legal developments, insights and news from Ashurst. By signing up, you agree to receive commercial messages from us. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Sign upThe information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.