UK merger control expanded: public health intervention and technology mergers
This article is part of the May/June 2020 edition of our competition law newsletter, focusing on some recent key developments.
With effect from 23 June 2020, the UK Government can intervene in UK merger control assessments in order to maintain the UK's capability to combat, and mitigate the effects of, public health emergencies. In simple terms, this means that the UK Government can now block a deal or (more likely) impose remedies if it has concerns that an acquisition of a relevant UK entity may make it more difficult to combat public health emergencies, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic.
what you need to know - key takeaways |
---|
|
Public interest intervention
Under UK merger control, the Competition and Markets Authority ("CMA") is generally the decision-maker. However, the Government can intervene on public interest grounds, in which case, the public interest consideration may trump the competition analysis conducted by the CMA. For example, the Government may block a deal or impose remedies on public interest grounds despite the CMA concluding there are no competition concerns. (As yet, no deals have actually been blocked on public interest grounds: typically, any concerns are dealt with by way of undertakings from the acquirer.)
Until 23 June, there were three public interest intervention grounds: national security, media plurality and stability of the financial system. The public health emergency ground has now been added as a fourth intervention ground. This change is a response to the current COVID-19 pandemic and a concern that critical businesses in such a pandemic (e.g. ones producing vaccines or personal protective equipment) may be more susceptible to takeovers by foreign buyers. This could potentially prejudice the UK's ability to combat the current pandemic, and future ones.
If businesses or investors consider it possible that a transaction could raise such concerns, government guidance encourages them to speak to the department as early as possible.
The changes do not require any business or investor to take any direct action. They do not affect, for example: the fact that the UK retains a voluntary notification mergers system; the other procedural provisions under UK merger control; the European Commission’s powers under the EU Merger Regulation.
Reduced thresholds for more technology mergers
In addition, the Government will introduce (once approved by the UK Parliament) reduced thresholds for three additional sectors which are perceived as important for national security:
- artificial intelligence;
- cryptographic authentication technology; and
- advanced materials.
In those sectors, acquisition of the following targets will be caught by UK merger control:
- targets with a UK turnover of GBP 1 million, instead of the usual GBP 70 million; and
- targets which have a 25% share of supply in the UK in one of those sectors, even if the UK turnover of the target business is below GBP 1 million.
These lower thresholds have been in place for targets active in the defence, computing hardware and quantum technology sectors since 2018.
A draft statutory instrument to bring about the expanded scope of the lower thresholds has been published. This indicates that:
- advanced materials relate, amongst other things, to materials capable of modifying the appearance, detectability, traceability or identification of any object to humans or sensors, and alloys formed by chemical or electrochemical reduction of feedstocks in the solid state; and
- cryptographic authentication is defined as the method of verifying a person, user, process or device, or the origin or content of a message, data or information, by means of electronic communication, where the method of verification has been encrypted.
National Security and Investment Bill
Finally, the Government plans to introduce a National Security and Investment Bill to Parliament soon. This will introduce a more typical system of control on foreign investments as exists in many other jurisdictions (e.g. CFIUS in the US and FIRB in Australia). It remains to be seen whether the Bill will be largely modelled on the previous Government's 2018 White Paper (see our summary update).
For more on the UK merger control regime, see our Quickguide.
Contents
- Power cables saga continues: ECJ annuls parts of NKT decision
- New Competition Tool and ex ante regulation of digital platforms - EU to widen its regulatory net
- EU Commission proposals to regulate foreign subsidies
- French public consultation on Fintechs
- First French fine for obstructing raid confirmed
- Round 3 to FCO: Landmark German Facebook data collection ban reinstated
- German banking industry attempts to stifle FinTech rivals thwarted
- Competition Tribunal adopts four-step approach to penalties
- First Italian approval decisions under temporary COVID-19 cooperation rules
- Legitimacy of ex-post remedies in Sky Italia and R2 (MP) merger reconfirmed
- Fines for Singapore Zoo and Bird Park building and maintenance bid rigging
- Spanish cartel diverging damages claims developments
- Shoppers would be "worse off" - CMA prohibits JD Sports/ Footasylum merger at Phase II
- Court of Appeal judgment on costs in Pfizer/Flynn excessive pricing case
- Continued rise of UK consumer law: Fake online reviews and COVID-19 pricing and cancelations
- CMA accepts unusual behavioural undertakings in relation to Bauer Media radio acquisitions
- UK Supreme Court: Interchange fees restricted competition
- Online RPM strikes again - further fines for online restrictions
- UK merger control expanded: public health intervention and technology mergers
Key Contacts
We bring together lawyers of the highest calibre with the technical knowledge, industry experience and regional know-how to provide the incisive advice our clients need.
Keep up to date
Sign up to receive the latest legal developments, insights and news from Ashurst. By signing up, you agree to receive commercial messages from us. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Sign upThe information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.