First Italian approval decisions under temporary COVID-19 cooperation rules
This article is part of the May/June 2020 edition of our competition law newsletter, focusing on some recent key developments.
On 27 May 2020, the Italian Competition Authority ("ICA") approved a joint purchasing agreement of surgical masks via pharmacies/drugstores and a moratorium scheme on loan repayments agreed within ASSOFIN (the Italian Association of Consumer Credit and Mortgage Lending) pursuant to its temporary rules on cooperation among companies during the COVID-19 outbreak.
what you need to know - key takeaways |
---|
|
On 24 April 2020, the ICA adopted a communication on cooperation between competitors during the COVID-19 emergency situation (the "Communication"). The Communication mirrors to a large extent the guidance set out in the European Commission's communication establishing a temporary framework for assessing antitrust issues related to business cooperation in response to situations of urgency stemming from the current COVID-19 outbreak (see our summary).
In essence, in some sectors cooperation in the supply of goods and services may be necessary during the COVID-19 emergency situation to overcome or mitigate the effects of the crisis. The Communication recognises, therefore, that certain forms of cooperation may be exempted from the general prohibition on anticompetitive agreements between competitors provided that the cooperation is temporary and does not go beyond what is strictly required to facilitate the supply of essential goods and services during the COVID-19 emergency situation.
There are four points to highlight:
- exchange of commercially sensitive information between competitors remains forbidden;
- the ICA has indicated that it will consider all queries it receives from companies about potential cooperation with competitors;
- the ICA may provide further specific guidance in relation to the application of national competition law in comfort letters; and
- the Communication stresses that it remains important to comply with the antitrust rules during the COVID-19 emergency situation, which the ICA will continue to enforce.
On 27 June, after consulting the European Commission, the ICA took its first two decisions applying the Communication. The first case concerned cooperation between competitors in connection with the distribution of surgical masks via pharmacies and drugstores. The second case concerned a common moratorium scheme for consumer credit reached by ASSOFIN.
The first cooperation scheme concerns the joint purchasing of surgical masks by the two main Italian associations of pharmaceutical distributors and their subsequent distribution among distributors at the unit purchase price negotiated with suppliers. Due to the exceptional health emergency and the limited duration of the agreement (until 30 June 2020), the ICA did not intervene, after concluding that the agreement was designed to manage an effective and homogeneous supply of essential personal protection devices throughout Italy.
In parallel, the ICA approved the common moratorium scheme agreed within ASSOFIN to delay the repayment of loans by consumers and companies that have been impacted by COVID-19 between 21 February and 30 June. The ICA also took into consideration the extraordinary emergency situation and the limited duration of the agreement, while stressing that companies adhering to the moratorium scheme must not directly or indirectly exchange commercially sensitive information. The ICA requested ASSOFIN to keep track of any exchanges of information that are deemed objectively necessary and proportionate to the achievement of the aims of the agreement, in case the ICA should request such information in the future.
As the ICA has made clear, companies should come forward if they are considering cooperating with a view to overcoming or mitigating the effects of the crisis on the supply of products or the provision of services to customers impacted by the pandemic. These first decision demonstrated the ICA's willingness to approve solutions that are necessary, temporary and proportionate.
With thanks to Sabina Pacifico of Ashurst for her contribution.
Contents
- Power cables saga continues: ECJ annuls parts of NKT decision
- New Competition Tool and ex ante regulation of digital platforms - EU to widen its regulatory net
- EU Commission proposals to regulate foreign subsidies
- French public consultation on Fintechs
- First French fine for obstructing raid confirmed
- Round 3 to FCO: Landmark German Facebook data collection ban reinstated
- German banking industry attempts to stifle FinTech rivals thwarted
- Competition Tribunal adopts four-step approach to penalties
- First Italian approval decisions under temporary COVID-19 cooperation rules
- Legitimacy of ex-post remedies in Sky Italia and R2 (MP) merger reconfirmed
- Fines for Singapore Zoo and Bird Park building and maintenance bid rigging
- Spanish cartel diverging damages claims developments
- Shoppers would be "worse off" - CMA prohibits JD Sports/ Footasylum merger at Phase II
- Court of Appeal judgment on costs in Pfizer/Flynn excessive pricing case
- Continued rise of UK consumer law: Fake online reviews and COVID-19 pricing and cancelations
- CMA accepts unusual behavioural undertakings in relation to Bauer Media radio acquisitions
- UK Supreme Court: Interchange fees restricted competition
- Online RPM strikes again - further fines for online restrictions
- UK merger control expanded: public health intervention and technology mergers
Key Contacts
We bring together lawyers of the highest calibre with the technical knowledge, industry experience and regional know-how to provide the incisive advice our clients need.
Keep up to date
Sign up to receive the latest legal developments, insights and news from Ashurst. By signing up, you agree to receive commercial messages from us. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Sign upThe information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.