ACCC achieves obstruction conviction in connection with cartel probe
This article is part of the February 2021 edition of our competition law newsletter, focusing on some recent key developments.
In December 2020, Jason Ellis, a former general manager of sales and marketing at BlueScope Steel Limited ("BlueScope"), was sentenced to eight months' imprisonment (suspended) and ordered to pay a A$10,000 fine, for inciting the obstruction of an investigation by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission ("ACCC") into alleged price fixing by BlueScope and Mr Ellis.
This was the first time an individual had been charged with, and convicted of, inciting the obstruction of an ACCC investigation.
what you need to know - key takeways |
---|
|
Background and summary
In October 2019, Mr Ellis was charged by the CDPP with two counts of inciting the obstruction of a Commonwealth official in the performance of their functions. The charges related to actions Mr Ellis took during an ACCC investigation into alleged cartel conduct by BlueScope and Mr Ellis.
The ACCC was investigating allegations that, between September 2013 and June 2014, BlueScope and Mr Ellis attempted to induce various steel distributors in Australia and overseas manufacturers to enter arrangements containing a price-fixing provision. The ACCC commenced civil proceedings against BlueScope and Mr Ellis in respect of those allegations in August 2019.
In September 2020, Mr Ellis entered a guilty plea to one "rolled-up" charge, for inciting two fellow BlueScope employees to give false evidence to the ACCC during its investigation, regarding discussions he and those employees had in meetings with certain steel companies.
In handing down the sentence, Magistrate Atkinson considered the conduct to be objectively serious, and said: "in all dealings [with the ACCC] a person needs to allow investigations to run properly, without any attempt to hinder investigations by officials".
The ACCC's investigative powers, including its information-gathering powers under section 155 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), are central to its ability to detect and gather evidence of cartels. Refusing or failing to comply with a section 155 notice by the due date is also a criminal offence, as is providing false or misleading information or evidence in response to a notice. These offences can also attract financial penalties and/or imprisonment.
Comment
The case demonstrates the seriousness with which the ACCC takes attempts to obstruct it from obtaining a full and truthful account of matters under investigation.
It also illustrates that such conduct may increase the potential legal liability of parties under investigation, exposing them not only to potential liability for the conduct under investigation but also prosecution for the subsequent obstructive conduct.
The ACCC's Chairman, Rod Sims, has indicated that the ACCC will not hesitate to make similar referrals to the CDPP in the future, where the ACCC considers parties have improperly sought to impede its investigations.
The proceedings against BlueScope and Mr Ellis for alleged cartel conduct remain ongoing, with a trial scheduled to commence in the Federal Court in August 2021.
Contents
- Kilpailu ja kuluttajavirasto: stop all the clocks, cut off the cartel
- Another episode in pay-TV saga as ECJ annuls Paramount's binding commitments
- EU General Court issues judgment in International Skating Union case
- European Court of Justice confirms default interest must be awarded on fines reimbursed
- Top EU Court confirms scope of liability for investors in companies involved in cartels
- ECJ confirms validity of information request in Qualcomm predation investigation
- The ACCC publishes its Final Report in the Home Loan Price Inquiry
- ACCC achieves obstruction conviction in connection with cartel probe
- The CNMC fines three solid fuel cartels and five individuals €3.7 million
- Spanish court reduces overcharge in trucks cartel from 20% to 8% on appeal
- Paris Court of Appeal preserves presumption of innocence, but upholds fines imposed on chemical distributor Brenntag
- The "captive banks" case - The Italian Administrative Court of First Instance annuls Italian Competition Authority's highest fine ever
- Italian Council of State confirms annulment of football TV rights bid-rigging decision
- German Federal Court of Justice delivers first ruling on the Trucks cartel
- CMA Orders Unwinding of Completed Trucks Parts Merger
- CMA publishes its final report on funerals and crematoria market investigation
- CMA fines suppliers of groundworks products to the UK construction industry over £15 million
- Supreme Court lowers the bar on certification for collective actions
- CAT rejects FP McCann's appeal of cartel fine
Key Contacts
We bring together lawyers of the highest calibre with the technical knowledge, industry experience and regional know-how to provide the incisive advice our clients need.
Keep up to date
Sign up to receive the latest legal developments, insights and news from Ashurst. By signing up, you agree to receive commercial messages from us. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Sign upThe information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.