Council of State upholds annulment of reinforcing steel bars and electro-welded wire mesh fines
This article is part of the January/February 2020 edition of our competition law newsletter, focusing on some recent key developments.
On 21 January 2020, the Council of State (Italy's Administrative Highest Court) handed down its judgment upholding the annulment of the Italian Competition Authority's ("ICA") decision of 19 July 2017 which had fined eight Italian steel producers for an alleged price-fixing cartel, based on the excessive duration of the ICA's pre-investigation activities, as well as the lack of sufficient evidence of the infringement.
what you need to know - key takeaways |
---|
|
According to the ICA, eight leading Italian steel manufacturers allegedly put in place a continuous and complex infringement between 2010 and 2016, by coordinating their commercial policies in the national market of reinforcing steel bars and electro-welded wire mesh, imposing total fines amounting to EUR 140 million.
In its judgment, the Council of State upheld the annulment of the ICA decision by the court of first instance, notably:
- confirming the excessive duration of the pre-investigation carried out by the ICA; and
- finding that the decision was manifestly unfounded and unreasonable, insofar as the ICA failed to prove, among other things, the anticompetitive nature of the exchange of information that would have allowed the parties to coordinate their commercial policies.
This judgment undoubtedly establishes an important principle as regards the parties' right to a reasonable duration of the proceedings. Indeed, according to the Council of State, irrespective of the national provisions regulating the authority's activity and its duration, "a pre-investigation phase carried out for an excessive period of time cannot be justified, since otherwise the general principles… on the certainty and efficiency of the administrative action set in the interest of both the public administration and the party concerned by the proceedings would be violated".
Such an assessment will very likely have an impact on future pre-investigation phases in Italy, namely forcing the ICA to speed up its activity of gathering documents and information before adopting a decision to open proceedings.
With thanks to Sabina Pacifico of Ashurst for her contribution.
Contents
- Europe fit for the digital age - a preview of how the EU might regulate AI and Big Data
- NBCUniversal fined for restricting sales of film merchandise
- ECJ provides further guidance on pay-for-delay cases
- End of the line for Ceské dráhy
- Belgium adopts new rules on simplified merger control procedures
- No second life for Continental Can before the French Competition Authority
- Paris Court of Appeal confirms CANNA France imposed prices on wholesalers
- 10th amendment to Germany's Competition Act
- ICA fines ENI for "greenwashing" Diesel+ fuel in ad campaign
- Council of State upholds annulment of reinforcing steel bars and electro-welded wire mesh fines
- Spanish authority accepts Adidas online sales restriction commitments
- Guitar maker fined for illegally preventing price discounts online
- First UK fine for failure to respond to market study information request
- Court of Appeal confirms Ping's online sales ban infringement
- When three is better than four: Federal Court approves TPG / Vodafone merger
- Federal Court of Australia rejects the ACCC's 'dieselgate' settlement and imposes a record $125 million fine on Volkswagen for breaches of the ACL
- The transition period and a potential future deal: Brexit's practical impact on competition law
Key Contacts
We bring together lawyers of the highest calibre with the technical knowledge, industry experience and regional know-how to provide the incisive advice our clients need.
Keep up to date
Sign up to receive the latest legal developments, insights and news from Ashurst. By signing up, you agree to receive commercial messages from us. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Sign upThe information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.