Insights
ASHURST TALKS | EMPLOYMENT
01 Apr 2019
World@Work - Video Series
April 2019
The PDF server is offline. Please try after sometime.
In this World@Work video series, we consider a range of investigations conducted by our global team, and lessons from these for multinational employers.
Click on the images below to stream the videos.
Asia
George Cooper and Ronnie King, partners
02 Apr 2019
Did the pile of blank letterhead give it away?
George Cooper and Ronnie King discuss an investigation into employee fraud and bribery across six countries in APAC and EMEA, in which a pile of blank letterhead was a key piece of evidence. (5 mins approx.)
Australia
Corey McHattan and Trent Sebbens, partners
02 Apr 2019
So what if there were impressions of hand written dates on the documents?
Corey McHattan and Trent Sebbens discuss the impact that Australia's new whistle-blower laws would have had on past investigations, and managing regulator reporting obligations. But what was the relevance of impressions of hand written dates on a pile of documents? (7 mins approx.)
France
Michaël Cousin and Nataline Fleury, partners
02 Apr 2019
Where's the smoking gun evidence?
Michaël Cousin and Nataline Fleury discuss a quest for 'smoking gun' evidence of competition law infringements, in the context of French employment law procedural protections. Did they find the 'smoking gun'? (5 mins approx.)
Germany
Andreas Mauroschat and Nicolas Nohlen, partners
02 Apr 2019
Is a witness credible with no supporting documents?
Andreas Mauroschat and Nicolas Nohlen discuss witness credibility, and the importance of global policies and clear communication when managing perceptions in an investigation into alleged harassment involving 15 (yes 15) countries. (5 mins approx.)
United Kingdom
Crowley Woodford and David Capps, partners
02 Apr 2019
Why are we still investigating – they resigned?
Crowley Woodford and David Capps discuss managing employment and regulatory requirements in tandem while investigating an alleged conflict of interest in personal financial transactions. In this matter, the respondent resigned before the investigation was complete, so what did they do? (5 mins approx.)
Key Contacts
We bring together lawyers of the highest calibre with the technical knowledge, industry experience and regional know-how to provide the incisive advice our clients need.
Load More
Keep up to date
Sign up to receive the latest legal developments, insights and news from Ashurst. By signing up, you agree to receive commercial messages from us. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Sign up
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
