UK Competition Commission reconsiders Ticketmaster/Live Nation clearance after Tribunal challenge (Competition newsletter, March 2010)

The UK Competition Commission (CC) has agreed to reconsider its clearance decision in relation to the Ticketmaster/Live Nation merger following a challenge lodged at the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT).

This is the fourth time in the last year that the CC has been forced to reconsider one of its decisions as a result of review applications made to the CAT.

Live Nation is a promoter of live music events and an owner/operator of live music venues. Ticketmaster is a ticket agent, selling tickets on behalf of live music promoters and venue operators. On 22 December 2009, the proposed merger between the parties was cleared unconditionally by the CC. This was despite the CC having provisionally concluded in October 2009 that the merger may be expected substantially to lessen competition in the market for live music ticket retailing. The CC's provisional view had been that the merger would create an incentive for Live Nation to impede the expansion of a potential new UK competitor in ticket retailing, CTS Eventim (Eventim), with which it had recently reached an agreement in relation to UK ticketing services. Submissions from Eventim had been central to these provisional concerns. However, the CC changed its view following representations from the parties that Live Nation would not in fact have offered any support to Eventim to become a successful UK ticket retailer.

In January 2010, Eventim challenged the CC's report, arguing that it had been denied a fair hearing, and that the CC had made a number of errors in its substantive assessment. While the CC denied that its substantive analysis was flawed, it accepted that Eventim's position was crucial to its assessment of the transaction's effect on potential entry into the UK market. The CC recognised that there were matters in its final report relating to Eventim's position on which it had failed to consult Eventim and that it could not be ruled out that Eventim's evidence would have changed its assessment.

Although the CC agreed voluntarily to settle Eventim's challenge by reconsidering its decision, it had to request the CAT to quash its report, since the statutory period within which the CC must publish its report had already expired. The CAT duly quashed the report on 11 February 2010. The CC has indicated that it will complete its reconsideration within three months.

This case follows three previous successful challenges to CC decisions within the last 12 months. The other cases related to the market investigations into groceries, payment protection insurance (PPI) and BAA airports services. For further details of the groceries and PPI reversals, see our November 2009 newsletter. The CC has indicated that it intends to appeal the BAA decision to the Court of Appeal. In that case, the CAT upheld BAA's claim that the CC's investigation was tainted by "apparent bias" in that one of the CC panel members had links with the owners of Manchester Airport, who were involved in the investigation and were potential bidders for airport assets to be divested by BAA.

The CAT's decision in relation to Ticketmaster/Live Nation is reminiscent of the successful challenge to the Office of Fair Trading's (OFT) 2005 decision in the Unichem case, where the OFT was required to reconsider a merger clearance due to a failure to consider evidence from a third party whose expected behaviour was important to its findings.



Please click on the links below for the other articles in the March 2010 competition newsletter

Contacts

Nigel Parr
T: +44 (0)20 7859 1763
E: nigel.parr@ashurst.com

Neil Cuninghame
T: +44 (0)20 7859 1147
E: neil.cuninghame@ashurst.com

Mats Johnsson
T: +46 (0)8 407 24 68
E: mats.johnsson@ashurst.com

 

This newsletter is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Readers should take legal advice before applying the information contained in this publication to specific issues or transactions.